I like your post, theplacesyoullgo. I shall functionize and further what you've written. Hope you don't mind.
theplacesyoullgo said:
ESTJs are better at giving explicit, point-by-point instructions to dumb people.
Te-Si is able to organize the thoughts for others based on a clear recollection of data regarding what they know.
ESTJ: "If it isn't REALLY broken, don't fix it."
Te-Si is accustomed to the working order of the system, so until it's proven ineffective, there's no real need to start over. And sometimes there really isn't a need as someone tries to do something new it becomes obvious that the old way really was for the best. But if they do see a need to fix the system they'll use a storehouse of former systems to compare and contrast, altering the system into one that's newly perfected from all the prior ones.
ENTJs like to boss people around almost as much, but it takes far more effort for them to actually explain something to another person.
Te-Ni can be more effort to explain due to the abstract quality of Ni unless the ENTJ has got a good handle on it. And that the ENTJ in question doesn't just expect the other to "know" what they mean just because they've said it. Makes sense to them, not necessarily to others, and when better balanced they typically strive for clarity with what they're saying because it's important that they're understood before they can move them/everyone forward.
This applies to ESTJ as well, though, instead with Si it might be more effort to explain something they deem obvious and others as being oblivious towards their understanding whereas ENTJ would think it's complex to others and that they're merely obtuse towards their understanding.
ENTJ: "How about if we... [list of possible improvements here]?"
Te-Ni discovers newly alternative views for transforming what they view as an outdated system, and they gather people into not only accepting their vision but of participating in the new design with their own little touches.