reckful
New member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2013
- Messages
- 656
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5
Sorry just 1 quickly pops to mind now, and is a great example:
Prometheus rising >> Author thinks N is highest rank, followed by T, followed by F, followed by S as the lowest. (Author is probably a nice guy who found out about the types in his own way, but mistakenly thinks its evolution of the human brain. Author doesn't know its interconnected/interdependant types that require each other.)
Prometheus Rising - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
P.S. Also any book on the AI subject of "the singularity", about the fantasy that one supercomputer could be all powerful, is basically saying that one type (this computer's type) can be superior. Same for any religion with a personal/idol-ized god of a certain type, the singularity is just a new theme. Its harder to find a book that doesn't think one type is superior, than the other way around.
Does Wilson's book talk in terms of the Jungian (or MBTI) functions, or are you the one who's decided that Wilson's brain model corresponds to those? Have you actually read Wilson's book?
The post of yours that I replied to was in response to BadOctopus talking about someone believing their MBTI "type is the best," and you said "whole books are written about how the author ranks the types."
I asked if you could name three of those "books," and you only pointed to one book, and it doesn't sound to me like that book even discussed Jungian/MBTI typology, much less "ranked the types."
I've been participating in online MBTI discussions for five years, and I've never seen anyone point to a book where the author purports to "rank the types" in terms of which ones are more "evolved." And it sounds like you don't really know of any such books, either.