If that was integrity, people need to increase the quality of the principles they stand on.
Well, "integrity" is a double-edged cushion, isn't it. On the one hand, one maintains a position, but on the other hand, one maintains a position. The first hand rests in the subjective world where maintaining a position is pretty much all one has to go on and is by definition a virtue. The second hand waves in the outside world where positions are a dime a dozen and maintaining just one means denying many others. So there's the person, perched on a position pillow, a cheek in one world and cheek in the other. On which cheek should she lean heaviest?
EDIT: *sigh* that doesn't make any sense, does it? Ass typology is what I want to call it. Instead of MBTI, one looks at asses and gets a type. But every type has two cheeks, which in this case are judgment functions, so how does one emphasize one cheek more than the other? If ass integrity correlates choosing one cheek over another with Fe and Fi, then the test works. But it won't work. Hypothetically, tertiary Fi types will choose subjective ass cheek, and tertiary Fe types with choose objective. But it's confused by every type also wanting to choose the other cheek. It's like the Jesus complex of ass typology.
Ah well. It would have been great though. Because typology workshops use booklets to encourage understanding, and the booklets include words for, I guess, the verbal people, but they have pictures too. I don't know exactly how the ass typology books would look, but it seems like a good idea anyway.
I shall search the internet for examples.