1. If you take a look at your post you will see that there is plenty of parts that guide reader to conclude that you feel quite romantic about those times. I can quote some parts if that is what it takes.
2.
You mean scientists and inventors, I imagine? How do you know they have all been NTs? I think it just as likely for a scientist to be an ST as an NT. And believe it or not, INFP and other types go into science, too.
If you read carefully you will see that there is "most credit" in the sentence.
But those who have done shaking of the big picture were mostly NTs.
When I take a look at my hard science Ph.D professors I see NT, NT, NT, NT, NT... and It look like most of them are introverted. Modern hard science is quite abstract and hard, with plenty of infomation. So many tipes don't have the patience to become experts.
3.
The only humane way to resolve the population problem is to devote resources to colonizing Mars.
I guess that, if people are reading too much science
fiction it is unavoidable that things like this appear. But none the less I will give the real NT answer.
Mars is 6800 kilometers in diameter and if we estimate that it is a perfect sphere you will find that it has a surface of 145 000 000 square kilometers + about 15% because of mountains and hills - pretty much same amount that is under polar dry ice caps.
But if you send 3 billion people you will get situation that you need to turn entire Mars into a giant city and place for crops. Because population density is about 21 on 1 square kilometer.
Can we even say that 100 people were lucky enough to leave the planet on the short time..
Average distance of the Moon and Earth is about 380 000 kilometers.
Mars when is in the point when it is the closest to the earth I is about 60 000 000 kilometers away. We don’t even have base on the Moon and you what to send billions to the Mars.
How will you transport them, what will those people eat and drink?
How will you keep them warm since normal temperatures are deep below the freezing point?
Also will you kidnap many people from undeveloped countries on Earth so that you could send them there?
I could talk about this more but I think you get the point.
4. That huge part about what should be done in the world, once again confirms my argument that we are in trouble exactly because someone didn’t think when was the time to think.
You are debating on the way I am finding quite odd, because I am getting impression that you find me quite conservative,
I guess that it is time to start showing the side that other people see as anti-social.
So far you didn't destroy my argument that in the case, that human beings are more T the entire population problem would not even exist in that case.
But this argument can be expanded quite well.
Why they didn't act?
The following argument people always find highly controversial but I think that it must be said here.
When you say something like "Does god really exists?" huge number of people will give you the look and they will find strange that someone says that he is an Atheist. But somehow they will get over it.
But if you start a debate "Do countries really exist?" you will encounter much bigger resistance.
That is because all of them are connected to their state in many ways: economic , emotional , sense of attachment ...............
So, can we say that all those countries really exist or they are just product of our imagination?
I say that they are product of our imagination because of large number of reasons.
If I become citizen of another country did I also become member of the nation, what if I just learn the language and spend my free time there as a tourist?
Am I capable of making someone pregnant in that country?
Now someone could say that they have a culture they have a language that they have …..
But culture changes as times go by ,so the culture you are actually “worshiping “ did not exist 50 years ago and it will not exist some 50 years from now.
Same works for language.
Then someone could say “Yes but we have permanent values, such as constitution “
In that case I could say “Let’s be realistic. Do you honestly believe that someone will follow that constitution in the 8397. century?
That constitution is not even 3 centuries old and it has trouble regulating many things that existed in the times when our grandparents were young. Plus the rate of progress is accelerating.
Also, if it happens that one day sky opens up and Jesus comes down to Earth once again.
I guarantee you that this constitution will not mean anything to you in that case. “
So can we say that overwhelming majority of world population is not thinking straight?
I think we can, and that the person must have many properties that he/she even starts to think in this direction.
I mean this is accepted all over the world and no one is questioning the sanity of entire thing.
So, why our progenitors were not careful about the population boom?
Because they were in competition against each other and big picture was irrelevant to them.
This is one very good example of how people are using their feeling in the wrong way and they claim that they can make the right choice.
Those feelings named here, that all people on this world feel all the time are something that remained from our tribal way of life and if we don’t find a way to control them. It could lead us to total catastrophe.
I am asking here and now can you prove that the Cold war was not directly caused by Fi?