neo said:
I did three tests tonight, on two I got INFP and one INFJ.
Welcome to the study of MBTI.
neo said:
Then I was told by someone that INFP was the 'retard' type.
Their lack of understanding is clear, and I don't say that just because I type as INFP.
neo said:
I read several descriptions of INFP and I think that while some parts relate to me the whole type just seems to be ridiculous.
First, the description of any type is nothing more than an abstraction. In as much as this is true, it will describe any given person only in part, and the degree to which it does so will vary just as each person does from one another. Also, the various abstracted descriptions of the types vary between and among one another. To this end, they may or may not speak to a given individual.
As it concerns your judgement of the whole type just seeming to be ridiculous, I appreciate your statement of values. That said, know that each type is as valid as any other as it concerns MBTI, personal thoughts and feelings notwithstanding.
neo said:
I can be imaginative but I have no problem translating my imagination and ideals into actionable plan and strategy. I don't just day dream.
The same can be said for many INFPs and INFJs.
neo said:
I'm still not convinced about the result or mbti to be honest.
I value a healthy skepticism, and indeed, many people question their results and MBTI itself.
neo said:
Are there any tests to prove anything it says? Like with astrology where they give out random descriptions, ask the person how accurate they are then correlate them with their actual star sign.
All that is required is your inquiry and discernment. You could seek out someone licensed by MBTI and have an assessment done, but in the end, you are the one who decides your own type, if any at all. You are your own proof.
MBTI is not like astrology, but it isn't hard science either.
cheers,
Ian