INTP
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 7,803
- MBTI Type
- intp
- Enneagram
- 5w4
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
is that a trick question or are you just stupid?
sosionics intp = mbti intj
you could have just wrote that on topic title..
is that a trick question or are you just stupid?
this has nothing to do with socionics. I am also assuming that Isabel Myerrs understanding of dominant cognitive functions is based on Jungs "most differentiated" function-types. I have made a few assumptions, I'm just putting it out there with all the data for people to make up their own mind on the matter. The point is to promote awareness, encourage discussion on compare conclusions and opinions on this by going straight to the source(Jung).
difference between Socionics & Mbti in that the first assigns J/P to dominant, while MBTI assigns it to the extroverted function (which for introverts is the secondary).
By what definition of Introverted Intuition? If it is that really long one you posted, can it be summed up in a paragraph or less?
If it could be easily summed up, it wouldn't be Ni.
OP:
Since you asked for opinions, here's mine: You're probably an inexperienced, under-developed, egoistic and self-absorbed individual who has a lot of growing up to do. Don't say you're going to say something- say it. Having an audience is a privilege- they owe you nothing. The earlier you learn this lesson, the better.
Also, bear in mind that reading large chunks of text is worthless if you do not absorb and process the information presented before you. You're wasting your time, and ours. Do something about it.
SOME INTP who subscribe to the MBTI meme are correct about being "perceivers" AND they are correct about not beeing Ni types. they are either ISTp (not Ni but SiTe) or ENTp (not Ni but Ti&Ne). keep that in mind when arguing with people who call out bullshit on the notion of this thread and carl jung, without even reading or without thinking twice. a lot of people identify with INTP, not because of test results, [meaning not because of alignement with the 4 letter dichotomy, in this case with the the P-archetpye], but because of something they have read and what they have read was written by authors who believed that INTP are rooted in Ti so they tried to make Ti sound like its some kind of P-ish thing, meaning they described a mixture of a shy entp (they exist) and a psychotic INTj(Ti). their writings are not rooted in observations of people who align with the P-archetype. observation is far too much work and does not pay back quick money and fame. instead they constructed virutal types (INTP profiles) from logical building blocks and tweaked the wordings until the nonsense is hidden underneath. needless to say, there is no aspect of development in their constructs.
SOME "INTP" who subscribe to the MBTI meme are correct about being "perceivers" AND they are correct about not beeing Ni types. they are either ISTp (not Ni but SiTe) or ENTp (not Ni but Ti&Ne). keep that in mind when arguing with people who call out bullshit on the notion of this thread and carl jung, without even reading or without thinking twice. a lot of people identify with INTP, not because of test results, [meaning not because of alignement with the 4 letter dichotomy, in this case with the the P-archetpye], but because of something they have read and what they have read was written by authors who believed that INTP are rooted in Ti so they tried to make Ti sound like its some kind of P-ish thing, meaning they described something that is like a mixture of a shy entp (they exist) and a psychotic (unstructured) INTj(TiNe). their writings are not rooted in observations of people who align with the P-archetype. observation is far too much work and does not pay back quick money, fame or power. instead they constructed virutal types (INTP profiles) from logical building blocks and tweaked the wordings until the contradictions are hidden underneath. needless to say, there is no aspect of development in their constructs, because no amount of bending words could justify the mbti function order once they had to deal with that.
and how does it make perfect sense to call someone judger who does not use a judging function?
(meaning a perceiver who stops at perception, cause he hasn't developed past it. Ni-Dom)