INTPs are usually good at spotting inconsistencies and contradictions. You don't appear to be.
Another contradiction.
INTPs are usually good at spotting inconsistencies and contradictions. You don't appear to be.
That was painful. But a good demonstration of why INTJs like (sycophantic) ENFPs.video
It's easy to see why someone like you might conflate confidence with arrogance.This over-confidence displayed in your own point of view seems more like INTJ-arrogance than INTP-reason.
Don't you mean bad INTJ?BAD INTP!
Why would that be a contradiction?
+INTPs will have a more limited source of information
INTPs have the tendency to cut themselves off from information, to confine themselves only to a certain area.
INTPs' information has more variety but less volume.
It's not an assumption when it's based on evidence."Hmmm, I could assume that he isn't a fucktard, or I can assume that he is. I'm going to go with the latter."
Hope this helps. Like I say, we aren't all equally gifted.
It's not an assumption when it's based on evidence.
Unlike the OP.
[MENTION=5143]Salomé[/MENTION] dang you Ns always take me to darn seriously. I pull of a little prank and then you nitpick it in such a boring and literal manner typical of INTP-analysis-paralysis, like you actually expected I was trying to have a logical discussion. I wasn't.
I do actually believe you are INTP, but just because you carry that almighty title doesn't mean I have to treat you like you're some kind of rare gift from God. As a matter of fact, INTP is the most common type on this forum, making you just another part of the hive.
I'm going to assume that you're stupid for saying this. Please see my posts above for added effect.
Who's more stupid, the stupid one or the one who thinks he's smart enough to label others as stupid?
[MENTION=15371]RaptorWizard[/MENTION] dang you Ss always take me to darn seriously.Under the INTPs dire need to classify things into definative categories and bring deadly precision into arguments, I could see why arguments such as artificial labels like stupid would convince you. It's just how you INTPs are wired.
Don't get me wrong, that's not a bad thing, it's just not how I think, so naturally we're going to have some confrontations and clashes.
Of course, I say this all the time, but bring it on. I love a good fight!
I guess that means you concede and I won!
Should you wish to re-enter the competition though, I would be a happy participant, as a hard-fought battle always brings more honor than an easy win.
I would argue that one could easily acquire information on a great variety of topics from fewer sources (which I think is what he meant), although when he says "to confine themselves to a certain area," it seems to imply that they confine themselves to a certain topic of study, which would contradict "INTPs' information has more variety". I'd like to hear [MENTION=14757]Doctorjuice[/MENTION] clarify what he meant.
And I don't care. But then I don't need anyone else to tell me how I differ from an INTJ (or how I don't)Ah, the contradiction wasn't contained within that statement, but in conjunction with another. I would argue that one could easily acquire information on a great variety of topics from fewer sources (which I think is what he meant), although when he says "to confine themselves to a certain area," it seems to imply that they confine themselves to a certain topic of study, which would contradict "INTPs' information has more variety". I'd like to hear [MENTION=14757]Doctorjuice[/MENTION] clarify what he meant.
The irony is, you're assuming I'm assuming something. Without any supporting evidence. Lol.As for my statement regarding your inclination to assume someone is ignorant, I stand by it. Written word over the internet is hardly definitive evidence, and we aren't all as concise or accurate in our speech. When something isn't adequately explained, it can often lead to false impressions.
Well, since he is known as "the stupid one," it's a pretty safe bet to assume that he's stupid. No?
Of course you weren't being serious. You were just being stupid. I get it. I don't have to enjoy your shtick though. It bores me at least as much as mine bores you. The moral of the story is, perhaps you should refrain from constantly expressing your opinion (of me) so odiously, or else stop complaining about the consequences. Entirely in your hands.[MENTION=5143]Salomé[/MENTION] dang you Ns always take me to darn seriously. I pull of a little prank and then you nitpick it in such a boring and literal manner typical of INTP-analysis-paralysis, like you actually expected I was trying to have a logical discussion. I wasn't.
The irony is, you're assuming I'm assuming something. Without offering any supporting evidence. Lol.
You are perhaps reflecting upon your own failing?