I agree that the
SimulatedWorld description of Fi (see back to the previous page) is biased. But, it's supposed to be.
SimulatedWorld's description is not about Fe. It's about Fi and how it feels for Fi users.
I have auxiliary Fi and this IS how it feels for me. These are judgment functions don't forget. They are supposed to cut the wheat from the chaff. I think there is a bias in Fi that finds undertones of shallowness and fakeness in Fe.
One function isn't better than the other. They are different. Isn't part of any judgment function (Fe, Fi, Te, Ti) to think it's right and the others are wrong? This is probably pretty useful from a personality perspective (don't we need to think we're right when we make a decision?), but not always what you want when you're trying to be empathetic.
Now, I as a (hopefully) mature and empathetic person can rise above the inherent biases in my Fi. And, in general I think I do. I also would hope that (hopefully) mature and empathetic Fe users can see beyond their inherent Fe biases to appreciate the beauty in Fi, and not chalk Fi up to being self-centered and inconsiderate of the group.
What I'm far more interested in, is do Dom Fi users and Auxiliary Fi users feel the same way about Fi that I and other Fi auxiliary users do? In other words, my hunch is that INFPs might not so strongly identify with the SimulatedWorld description of Fi as ENFPs. My intuition about this is fairly strong, but I'm at a loss as to exactly why this would be so.