EcK
The Memes Justify the End
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 7,707
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
- Enneagram
- 738
Hey! There were NFs in here! I'm not unprecedented.
Yeah I hoped to get away with that one
lets call it a draw
Hey! There were NFs in here! I'm not unprecedented.
That seems like a baseless statement. Care to elaborate? About the penis size I believe studies say that on average guys want like 1 more inch or something. Dunno about Width though. And where does it end?
Are you calling introverted hermits stupid?
at the end of the day all things imagined, intuitive, creative or brilliant has to be measured in whatever possible measurements to be considered worthwhile. Unless of course one is an INTP.
Perhaps that's how you work. Don't assume these are necessarily my operating parameters just because we both scored entp (look at the statement in low resolution (because we're both guys\humans or get rid of 'because we bot scored entp' if you want, not a very meaningful part of my statement)That is hardly the case. The intellect convinced oneself that the intellect is superior or one saw soemthint the other didn't see, the intellect is right etc and thereby convices oneself to back off.
The good old 'if a tree falls in a forest and there's no one to hear it does it make a so...'.Basically saying that the introverted hermits rarely care about the measurement of what ever things, tangible or intangible.
Perhaps that's how you work. Don't assume these are necessarily my operating parameters just because we both scored entp
Depends how you define ego. What about metacognition I mean. You can 'look at yourself' (well part of yourself can look at other parts) without necessarily implying that metacognition is in any way different from the ego. That simultaneity implies that your ego vs intellect situation wouldn't be a 1 or 0 situation. The I is multiple and entangled and your dichotomy seems unjustifiedIntellect is not the person. The ego is the person.
Depends how you define ego. What about metacognition I mean. You can 'look at yourself' (well part of yourself can look at other parts) without necessarily implying that metacognition is in any way different from the ego. That simultaneity implies that your ego vs intellect situation wouldn't be a 1 or 0 situation. The I is multiple and entangled and your dichotomy seems unjustified