Well, you have to take several things in context. For example, no type is an island (or at least, it's rare). Jung largely intended to write stereotypical caricatures of the eight features humankind could embody, not wholly intending to define a person with one particular excerpt. So you have to isolate the variables when comparing and contrasting; Just because an extraverted intuitor enjoys taking a bath or a meal does not mean those are features of an extraverted intuitor, because the concept has already been isolated by another variable - extraverted sensing.
I would like to point out that Jung states extraverted sensors do not even seek a good meal, simply a meal is often of chief concern. I think an extraverted intuitor would be more driven for a "good" meal. Again, when Jung used the term possibilities, it really was synonymous with "expectations". Extraverted intuitors see the potential in an object and really try to bring it to the surface (contrasted against Si, who takes on more of an observer role). Se is a lot more monk-like in its orientation to the external world, "simpler" probably isn't a bad term.
Uh, I forgot where I was going with this. I have a tendency to work on my posts for an absurd amount of time, so I'll stop now
Edit: I think the bath thing is more introverted than anything. Jung said extraverted irrationals often weren't keen on reflection, and I see baths as a major wind-down reflection period. Though maybe they need it after all the go-go-go, lolz.