The box. Learn not to trust it.
Apparently, you haven't read many of my posts.
Consider the following:
1) The dominant function is the function we use to absorb process information. The auxiliary function is used to organize and communicate said information.
Ummm, that's not even "the box" you're describing.
The dominant function isn't the function that we use to "absorb process" information.
The dominant function is simply the mind's top functional spot.
What function is
in the dominant position determines what the dominant position does.
It sounds like you're mistaking the dominant position for a P function, and the auxiliary position for a J function...
Perhaps because you're a P-dom and J-aux...?
J-doms and P-auxs do things differently, ya know?
Hence why ENTJs seem so bossy: they act
before they process.
INTJs, on the other hand, seem less bossy: they
process before they act.
Conclusion: Jung was an idiot, and a better cognitive function theory is needed.
Not that I agree with everything Jung said (I mean, he believed functions 2-4 were all of opposite attitude to function 1, which has since fallen out of favor, and which I, personally, think is complete bullshit), but you might want to be a little more careful about who you go around calling an idiot, and gain a better grasp of the current typological theory(s) before you do...