It's ironic how two N types say that the most useless are the N functions.
I think your question is based on a Te definition of "useless", so it's hard to give a meaningful answer.
It all depends on what seems useful to you.
Any function more of less useful than others?
What are your opinions? Would the world fall apart, if for example, Fe became extinct, or there was a global ban on Ni?
This, in particular, is stupid. Without Ne we'd still be living in caves and fishing fire out of trees.I think Fi is probably the most useless. And both of the intuitive functions
Absolutely no function is useless. They all serve some purpose to humanity or another.
This, in particular, is stupid. Without Ne we'd still be living in caves and fishing fire out of trees.
I understood the question, but it's unanswerable. All functions are more or less equally useful in their own way.The question wasnt which is useless, it was which is MORE useless relative to others. If you want to insult a thread you might want to read what its about first and take a moment to mull it over.
By definition, Fi is the most useless function. Fi double checks for anything that is simply unconscionable, regardless of cause/effect, results or bottom line "success".
That's like asking if any color is better than another.
Without Fi we have no sense of self. We have no sense of enjoyment, nor most of what makes us human.By definition, Fi is the most useless function. Fi double checks for anything that is simply unconscionable, regardless of cause/effect, results or bottom line "success".
Almost by definition, Fi is the function most opposed to being useful. So now we must ask, how useful is the "unconcionable alarm system"? I think its rather easily replaced by properly functioning Fe and Ti working together...
LIES! That's what the Vast Green-Wing Conspiracy wants you to think.Green is obviously better than blue