• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[NT] It's so hard to me as a NT to live in the majority S world

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I thought that WAS the SP stereotype . . .

it is... and nobody brought that up as an accusation in the whole "Ss behave like this" thing... they were busy accusing us all of being the SJ stereotype which really doesn't apply to the SPs very well :unsure:
 

Yama

Permabanned
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
7,684
MBTI Type
ESFJ
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
it is... and nobody brought that up as an accusation in the whole "Ss behave like this" thing... they were busy accusing us all of being the SJ stereotype which really doesn't apply to the SPs very well :unsure:

Doesn't apply to the SJs very well either. :shrug:
 

Coriolis

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Staff member
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
27,198
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Sorry, I can't respond to this unless I can acknowledge it. :shrug:
But you just did.

A general response in the context of the thread does not require a personal acknowledgment, but suit yourself.
 

magpie

Permabanned
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
3,428
Enneagram
614
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
But you just did.

A general response in the context of the thread does not require a personal acknowledgment, but suit yourself.

It seems weird to me that you would share personal information without wanting a personal acknowledgement. Why did you share?
 

Coriolis

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Staff member
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
27,198
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
It seems weird to me that you would share personal information without wanting a personal acknowledgement. Why did you share?
To provide an additional perspective that is relevant to the thread topic. To answer your questions. To add to the data set.
 

magpie

Permabanned
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
3,428
Enneagram
614
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
To provide an additional perspective that is relevant to the thread topic. To answer your questions. To add to the data set.

I see you put two spaces between sentences. You must be over 35.
 

magpie

Permabanned
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
3,428
Enneagram
614
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
An irrelevant assumption.

So was your assumption that I was interested in hearing your personal statement when I asked labyrinthine the question.
 

Coriolis

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Staff member
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
27,198
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
So was your assumption that I was interested in hearing your personal statement when I asked labyrinthine the question.
No. My assumption was that a question posted on a public thread is open for anyone to respond.

This exchange is a derail, and I will not continue it further.
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,045
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
[MENTION=14857]labyrinthine[/MENTION]

stereotyping based on type that way only makes the problems worse

sure, EVERYBODY, regardless of type, has trouble fitting in... some of us have had a worse time of it than others whether we are sensors or intuitors... a lot of that boils down to "are we what's expected?" and "are we willing to conform?" and there are plenty of sensors who can answer no to both of those questions and plenty of intuitives who can answer yes and a ton of people of either side of that dichotomy who can answer no to one and yes to the other

the answer isn't to show differences and make two separate camps... it's to realize that we have a hell of a lot more in common than common MBTI texts would lead us to believe and to learn to work with that

I'm not what's expected and I'm not willing to take up interests and hobbies that bore me in order to fit in somewhere... I have, however, learned to carve out my own niche, find my own friends and make things work for me despite not being "who I should be" because I've learned, by this point in my life, that it is possible to do that
How would you describe the differences between Sensoring and iNtuition? Even if there are more commonalities, what is the point of having any distinction if differences are negligible? Why not do away with the categories completely? Even Jung makes some generalizations as he discusses each function.

I reread some of my posts, and I can see some subtext for not associating intellectualism with Sensing, but that is only because it isn't associated with the majority of the population, and I've never had the mindset of Sensors being less intellectual. I can recognize a very low-IQ Ni-dom, and I met one who was obsessed with the idea that everything in reality is based on the number 3, which he explained in great detail of various ideas grouped into three. Perhaps I need to figure out a different word from "abstract" because there is an aspect to Ti/Te that is based on abstract, analytical reasoning which is drawn to science. Jung describes Ni as an abstraction of an abstraction in its perception of reality. There is something about it that is worth understanding for what it is, and there is a way it doesn't integrate as easily.

Edit: Also, the scrapbooking, church, and band examples of activities that connect people were not intended to communicate an 100% overlay with the category of Sensing. There could be a higher percentage of Sensors in those activities, as there are in the population, but I threw the band one in there for some contrast, and could have tried to add more, but my point is that to connect with the most people socially, you have to conform somewhat, so any person (N or S) can weigh the costs and rewards for joining a dis-interesting activity for the sake of social connection. What is ideal is when people naturally share common interests of whatever nature (rock climbing, chess, science, etc.) The more an individual's natural interests overlap with the interests of others, the better off they will be for connecting. The fewer natural interests overlap, then the more the person will have to conform if they want a connection. My guess is that Ni-doms, based on Jung's descriptions of the function, are going to have to work extra hard to make a connection. /edit

Also, to what degree does personality theory and an online forum like this actually filter out the portion of the population that is most strongly concrete? I agree with EJCC that the majority of people use both an S and N function regularly, but there is also some percentage of the population that strongly uses either and N or S function. I can only remember one poster, a Se-dom who was here for a while that identified as being almost completely concrete, but I know several people in real life who interact and express only tangible, concrete ideas, but I can't imagine them ever coming here to talk about personality theory. It can create a different stereotype to say that everyone is essentially the same. How do you address differences and categories for people? How do you define Sensing? or iNtuition? I agree the category definitions do not define individual people, so what purpose do they serve?
 

Cellmold

Wake, See, Sing, Dance
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
6,266
This is about avoidance and excuses; about what we tell ourselves we can or cannot deal with.

It's a narrative & like all narratives it follows a clean, linear progression that neatly ties the world together. It isn't accurate and about as far from 'reality' as can be, but appears more comfortable as an explanation than the more intricate and effort based interactions we would otherwise have to go through in order to progress.

Look past typology as an explanation.

Perhaps a bit rich coming from me though. :alttongue:
 

entropie

Permabanned
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
16,767
MBTI Type
entp
Enneagram
783
There are ways that most every person feels isolated at times, but there are segments of the population that do have more in common to chat about, share similar activities, and feel commonality. People experience commonality and isolation to different degrees overall, even though every person experiences some of both during a lifetime.

Basically, if you want to feel a sense of commonality and connection with people in general, you do have to conform to the prevailing social norm. If everyone is scrapbooking, you better sign up and paste cute pictures and lacey borders on your memories or you won't have friends. If everyone goes to church, you better sign up, sit in a pew, bring food and eat the picnic lunch afterwards while gossiping about the pastor and other members. If you want to join the band, you better go to the clubs, dress the same way they do, listen to the same music, and have the same ideas.

When a person doesn't naturally fit into the norm and can't conform to hide the fact, they are going to feel predominately isolated from people. That social isolation itself can be damaging to self-esteem, "what's wrong with me that I can't fit in or connect with the majority of people? What's wrong with me that my interests are different from other people?" I don't see the point in ostracizing someone for this. Those are difficult questions and there is a cost and a reward for however we choose to live our lives. If we choose personal authenticity, we won't have as much social connection and can end up feeling lonely or out of place. If you pay the price of conformity, they you will have the comfort of social belonging. The cost is higher for some people and the reward is greater for some. Whichever is greater will direct our chocies.

Yes I am with you on that. One of the reasons I joined this forum is my inherent unhappiness with my culture. They are just boring, always care for their security rather than try new things and are so damned conservative that nothing really ever changes. With age I have come to make my peace with them. I found they have many bright sides as well, which are different in those cultures I rather tend to like before. But the feeling of community isnt still there for me, I always feel like the Sole Survivor around here. But that is ok too, since I am no party animal and am quite happy with myself.
I did tho find out that its not the S trait that is responsible for herding or the formation of a society. No there are many N under them as well. My theory is that what bothers Ns about Ss in general is that most of them tend to lack the ability to see a connection. Like I am talking about X that you can use in the way A and B and then I make a connection between A and B to imply X. If you are a very down and self-esteem less sensor now, because you never had the chance to change that, you have a bit of an unrecognized inner demand to be understood by someone. And that requires, if you are very closed up - a bold trial and error approach to get to know you, fueled by intuition, life experience or empathy. Since most young people dont have life experience, its rather the intuitive people that leave an expression with you. Cause their World is strange as well - a thing you can identify with - or they are more able to get to your bottom. Thats just a theory tho.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
19,925
Since the OP seems to be fairly similar to me I will defined the claims.


In my opinion this "rant" was not really about S/N it was about frustration about being surrounded by people who seem to lack brain and S/N was just a simplification of that. Living and existing as a NTJ leads to almost inevitable frustration that can last for a lifetime. Towards ENTJs most people lack the ability to assess the situation and make a long term solution, plus they make all kinds of rules that don't make sense or they are even counter productive from the perspective of common sense. Problem with sensors in general is that they are not people of vision and even if they are interested into abstract things these aren't very abstract things ... or they do it more like "that is an interesting idea". What generally creates reactive lifestyle that can frustrate an ENTJ to an observable degree. Especially since this means that we have to design pretty much every system and can't make mistakes since there is not many people that can replace us or figure out the subtle mistakes. My whole life I am sotonized for all kinds of things but the end of the day I was the guy who: was parent to my parents, achiever of the family, the one that ALWAYS leads the group assignments ... etc. Most people don't realize that "Things will sort out themselves" is basically "I hope that the guy at the top will solve this with one blow", they may not be aware of it but this is what they are saying in the end. Therefore if you want me to run the whole thing you can at least appreciate my knowledge and logic that keep the whole system in place.


I think this is what really writtes in the OP.
 

cascadeco

New member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,083
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
9w1
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
I would actually expect that, and I realize the Nassim Haramein reference in contrast to discussion about yard work was a big mistake on my part. I didn't mean to imply the intelligence differential, but he was the first one who came to my mind for someone really abstract, and actually rejected by his discipline in academia. I don't think there is any intelligence differential between S and N, and that the medical field and scientific research tends to benefit from Sensor based intelligence. I think most of my colleagues in classical music are Sensor and that those cognitive styles benefit the skills required. At the risk of making another generalization, IS-Ps do actually seem really similar to iNtuitives and can be moreso than someone whose dominant function is somewhere between Ni and Si. I even know some extremely dominant ESFJs who have hidden whimsy that just isn't indulged often. My ISTJ aunt was a literature major and described me as being like Anne of Green Gables, so she had a lot of deeply hidden whimsy that connected with me.

The second error was not communicating the conformity issue correctly. I do think that an investment in the concrete external world can provide a natural way for people to connect in terms of ideas, but it is only one of multiple factors relating to connection as the positive expression of it and conformity as the negative expression of it.. Ni in particular is defined by Jung as an internalized abstraction of reality, so it could follow naturally that a Ni-dom could reasonably have more difficulty connecting and in order to form connection would be required to conform to external requirements. Fe also plays a significant role in social conformity pressures.

I framed my response from the perspective of various abstract loners I've known who happened to be intelligent, so that there is a differential for them specifically and personally in their environments, but no, I don't think that is the case for defining all of S or N. I think it could be really demoralizing to feel completely out of place in your environment, to express something of it online, and have everyone berate you for it. The theoretical categories of MBTI could invite a sense of solace especially for a Ni-dom, so I think a person should at least be able to express some frustration about their life and not have it mean something specific about anyone posting here online. When I made my response I was excluding anyone I could think of on this forum who might identify as a Sensor, and was just thinking about the way real life often looks.

I totally hear you regarding how poignant isolation and aloneness can feel; how one can be and feel very isolated from their peers, find lack of commonalities, have difficulties finding or having a sense of community, feeling 'different' from others, not easily able to integrate.

I think the challenge though is that each and every single person can feel this way. It is just that the specific cause of feeling of isolation for highly abstract N's will be different from those of non-highly-abstract people.

I do agree there are inherent differences between every person, and there are scales of various traits; some people are more engaging, others less so, some people highly intelligent, others less so, some people highly empathetic, others less so, some people loving to work with their hands, others less so. And the list goes on and on. And for each of these traits, people might feel deeply ostracized or misunderstood or 'alone'. Yes, N's such as you describe have a unique form of feeling alone, but I think any pushback you are getting is due to the fact that every single person can feel this way.

However I agree with you, it is easy to observe and think that some sorts of people have it 'easier' than others in this context -- ie the people who have an interest that tons and tons of other people share. Maybe that's true. But, I don't think the interest element is clearly an N/S thing (not sure you're saying that either).

I was, objectively, probably one of the most 'alone' people in my junior high and high school class (I couldn't comprehend how and why everyone was the way they were and why they treated everyone like they were, I observed my peers and what they said and did to one another and became afraid of them), but much of that was due to my own self fulfulling thoughts (similar to OP -- believing myself to be inherently 'other' than other people) and fears of others. And, my interests are still nothing close to the norm. I still struggle greatly with community / feeling I really fit in well. But the difference is that now I don't actually think that's the case, any more than anyone else.

But yeah, I hear you on feeling intrinsically different from other people in terms of one or more trait, and the power that can have if you allow it to.


(Also in closing -- I always love to use my ISTJ mom as an example, because although on the surface you could say she shares many common interests with people, and she has joined various church group things, when you talk to her in person she is often anxious and feels very different from other people; she has always struggled with this)
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,568
So do you just deal or expect the world to change to accommodate you?
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,045
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
I totally hear you regarding how poignant isolation and aloneness can feel; how one can be and feel very isolated from their peers, find lack of commonalities, have difficulties finding or having a sense of community, feeling 'different' from others, not easily able to integrate.

I think the challenge though is that each and every single person can feel this way. It is just that the specific cause of feeling of isolation for highly abstract N's will be different from those of non-highly-abstract people.
I think Enneagram 4 is a strong component for feeling different from the norm, of the judging functions I think Fi is the most isolated from the norm, of the perceiving functions, I think Ni is the most off from the norm. Based on how Jung describes Ni, I don't see a lot of people wanting a conversation or a connection with such a person. The Ni-dom has to conform to connect the majority of the time.
Jung on Ni said:
But the crank contents himself with the intuition by which he himself is shaped and determined. Intensification of intuition naturally often results in an extraordinary aloofness of the individual from tangible reality; he may even become a complete enigma to his own immediate circle.

I do agree there are inherent differences between every person, and there are scales of various traits; some people are more engaging, others less so, some people highly intelligent, others less so, some people highly empathetic, others less so, some people loving to work with their hands, others less so. And the list goes on and on. And for each of these traits, people might feel deeply ostracized or misunderstood or 'alone'. Yes, N's such as you describe have a unique form of feeling alone, but I think any pushback you are getting is due to the fact that every single person can feel this way.
I believe that existential isolation is a real thing - that we can continually move towards connecting with others, but that ultimately each individual is unknowable.

However I agree with you, it is easy to observe and think that some sorts of people have it 'easier' than others in this context -- ie the people who have an interest that tons and tons of other people share. Maybe that's true. But, I don't think the interest element is clearly an N/S thing (not sure you're saying that either).
I was talking about two categories that overlap, but my communication was misunderstood, and I've been trying to figure out if there is a way I can clarify, or if it is just better to let it go. My purpose was to help the OP person feel less isolated not to make Sensors on the forum feel judged. Anyone present on this forum enjoys talking about theory by the very nature of this activity, so the activities I listed were designed to likely resonate with the frustration an INTJ might feel, rather than saying every Sensor scrapbooks. I'm actually really confused by this thread, and am trying to figure out how to word things so people don't think I'm drawing absurd conclusions like that.

Edit: Okay, I realized how to say a big part of the confusion. Whenever people express a negative experience directed at another category, there seems to be an assumption that it nullifies anyone else's pain. This happens in the feminism threads where if a woman says they experience something difficult from men, there is this automatic assumption that men always have it easy and never have pain. When a iNtuitive expresses isolation from Sensors, there is an automatic assumption that it means Sensors never feel pain of isolation. Why is that assumption connected? Just because one person experiences a certain kind of pain, it doesn't mean that no one else does. Of course there are different ways that people feel isolated. There isn't one thing that isolates and either you have it or you don't, but that doesn't mean there isn't a dynamic happening that causes legitimate pain. It almost always feels like expressions of pain are treated like hot potato game where only one person gets to have a valid expression, so if someone else says it, then it automatically invalidates everyone else. I do not understand that assumption, but I see it play out very often. /edit

I was, objectively, probably one of the most 'alone' people in my junior high and high school class (I couldn't comprehend how and why everyone was the way they were and why they treated everyone like they were, I observed my peers and what they said and did to one another and became afraid of them), but much of that was due to my own self fulfulling thoughts (similar to OP -- believing myself to be inherently 'other' than other people) and fears of others. And, my interests are still nothing close to the norm. I still struggle greatly with community / feeling I really fit in well. But the difference is that now I don't actually think that's the case, any more than anyone else.

But yeah, I hear you on feeling intrinsically different from other people in terms of one or more trait, and the power that can have if you allow it to.
I never had a close friend throughout junior high and high school and spent almost all of my time alone, and a sense of isolation was the driving force in my life. My best friend was a tree for many years until lightening struck it and it was all broken. :cry: (completely true but also meant as a joke)

(Also in closing -- I always love to use my ISTJ mom as an example, because although on the surface you could say she shares many common interests with people, and she has joined various church group things, when you talk to her in person she is often anxious and feels very different from other people; she has always struggled with this)
I think my boyfriend is an iNtuitive (although I can't figure out if he's INFJ or ENFP), but most of the friends now are Sensors and the two I keep in touch with because they have some really hard things in their lives are IS?Js. I did share some of my crazy internal perceptions with one, and she shared part of it as well. There is a retired ESFP lady I occasionally have lunch with, and I admire her ability to give people very specific compliments based on her keen observations.

My boyfriend's parents are *extremely* concrete and only talk about movies watched, shopping centers being built, and work to be done on the house and yard. It's a strange feeling when interacting and I mostly hide everything about myself, but do try to positive and helpful. They would never be curious about a site like this. During the years I was in church, there was a lot of that feeling of complete concreteness in people. However, I'm not putting it down because some super concrete people do a tremendous amount of good in the world providing food and clothes for the needy, etc. But I don't think they are interested in my internal world, and I don't expect them to be. If you are only around people who don't want to connect with you unless you conform to their requirements, then you will feel isolated.

It's funny, but when I started writing about feelings and experiences in my blog that are the part of myself I feel is outside the norm, you are about the only person to respond. I mostly expected to isolate myself by doing that.
 

prplchknz

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
34,397
MBTI Type
yupp
No one thinks they fit in regardless of type read [MENTION=4945]EJCC[/MENTION]'s blog she's estj as fuck and feels like she doesn't fit in a lot of times.
 
Top