^ [MENTION=14857]labyrinthine[/MENTION] I find that framing that as an N vs. S thing is limiting. You end up missing out on making SJ and SP friends who are actually interested in philosophy and abstract thought. Better to frame it as a question of interests -- as you just did -- vs. an S/N communication breakdown.
Edit: You could actually frame it as Ne vs. Ni if you want to. My friend group is kooky and abstract and bizarre and wonderful, and we're predominantly a mix of NPs and SJs. So, lots of Ne jokes.
One could argue that there is greater diversity among Sensor than iNtuitive because there are greater numbers of Sensors in the world.
I actually completely separate the individual from the generalized abstractions. I was trying to defend the OP who in the beginning of the thread was being what I perceived to be ostracized and I'd bet they actually have a point about feeling isolated in their own world. I also don't place objective value judgments on personal differences. Yes, I personally identify with the abstract nerd, but I expect and might even desire that the concrete person feel good about their perspective and even feel superior for it. I suspect many do, and that is their prerogative, but the person in the OP also has their own right to say they feel different and isolated in their context, and it may be because others mostly focus on the concrete.
It's okay for some people to prefer and value one way of being and others to prefer and value another. Objectively they are equivalent. It does feel strange to me that in my own brain I don't think in value judgments on the different ways of being, and yet, I see people respond like I've said some horrific thing. Would it help to say that some iNtuitive are so abstract to be perceived as, and possibly be, mildly insane? David Icke doesn't fit in generally and he is a definite Ni-dom. Is he superior to an intelligent, successful Sensor? And yet, he may have trouble finding people in his local environment who desire a conversation with him. He has a right to be who he is regardless of how outside the norm.
So, if there is a tendency among the generalized population of Sensor to move towards pure focus on the concrete, there is a generalized tendency for iNtuitives to become so abstract to diverge from reality. Which is the criticism? Which is the superior flaw? I don't place an objective value judgment on it.