EJCC
The Devil of TypoC
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2008
- Messages
- 19,129
- MBTI Type
- ESTJ
- Enneagram
- 1w9
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/so
It's not what's PC. It's what's logical.The PC police immediately steps out of the commissariat...
I'm just sayin'.
It's not what's PC. It's what's logical.The PC police immediately steps out of the commissariat...
The PC police immediately steps out of the commissariat...
Can nobody enjoy an attempt at making a point peppered with sardonic splendour and in deadpan style anymore?
The PC police immediately steps out of the commissariat...
You're underestimating human ingenuity. We have survived for about 400 thousand years before inventing electricity.So much arrogance in this thread.
Seriously we're a bunch of hairless apes who if the power went off would be dead within a week.
That's the general idea.But we are going to start typing God are we?
Well, quite obviously an all-knowing, all-seeing being would have the ability to use every cognitive function to perfection, but if we assume God has a personality then it's quite possible he would prefer to use a certain functional set. From his depiction in the Old Testament he quite obviously prefers to use Te, Ni, Se and Fi, in that order.Very well then.. God sees all and knows all .. God is everywhere and everything to everyone.
He transcends type obviously.
Irrelevant. He has a recorded personality so we can type him as an intellectual exercise regardless.1. Is God even real?
Well, Lex should shut his fucking trap either way because he's spouting nonsense, but otherwise there's nothing particularly wrong with typing God as a theoretical exercise.If it isn't, then INTJs should shut their traps.
This is just incoherent rambling. Oh, and once again, God is not INTJ. Old Testament God was ENTJ, and then New Testament God was ENFP.2. If God is real, and IF God was an INTJ, thus are INTJs real?
3. If God wasn't an INTJ, then what is he?
4. If God was an INTJ, then does that mean he's a f*cked up idiot to have created everyone else? Is he stupid or something?
5. If he wasn't, then he can't be an INTJ.
6. Thus no matter how you see it, God can't be INTJ.
Thus, INTJs should still shut their traps.
Again, you're developing a false conclusion using unrelated variables. First Ming, now this.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Ming's response was convoluted, and I had to painfully extract the "logic" contained within it, which turned out to be mercurial. I simply felt like responding in kind.
Well, Lex should shut his fucking trap either way because he's spouting nonsense, but otherwise there's nothing particularly wrong with typing God as a theoretical exercise.
No, I got that. Ming has made it pretty obvious that he's homosexual.
Just seems like a sucker punch to cultivate a comparison between something as intimate as sexual preference with something as cheap as an online spitting match.
You're underestimating human ingenuity. We have survived for about 400 thousand years before inventing electricity.
That's the general idea.
Well, quite obviously an all-knowing, all-seeing being would have the ability to use every cognitive function to perfection, but if we assume God has a personality then it's quite possible he would prefer to use a certain functional set. From his depiction in the Old Testament he quite obviously prefers to use Te, Ni, Se and Fi, in that order.
Irrelevant. He has a recorded personality so we can type him as an intellectual exercise regardless.
Well, Lex should shut his fucking trap either way because he's spouting nonsense, but otherwise there's nothing particularly wrong with typing God as a theoretical exercise.
This is just incoherent rambling.
Extraneous.
I thought you were INTJ?
I don't know. This thread seems pretty...gay.
And what are you? You seem to change types as if they were moods.
As long as everyone is on the same page as to what y'all mean by "God". There's God as a literary figure, analyzed by objective outsiders based purely on the Bible, and then there's the God that people actually believe in, who, as Arclight and I have been stating, is IMPOSSIBLE to type.Irrelevant. He has a recorded personality so we can type him as an intellectual exercise regardless.
Well, Lex should shut his fucking trap either way because he's spouting nonsense, but otherwise there's nothing particularly wrong with typing God as a theoretical exercise.
You completely missed my point.. That's OK, Good sir.. I have come to expect that of you. I still think you are a Good Sir.. I do not say that with any intent of sarcasm. But It is quite apparent to me that most times you don't have a clue what I am talking about.
Misdirection.
You haven't stated anything worth seriously responding to.
What is it with INFPs and the honorific, "good sir"?
In other words, there is no direction for me to follow but my own.
The OP asks a question and provides an argument (I dunno if it's shitty or not, the discussion an sich doesn't interest me). And then half of the replies are people being all frowny because he had the audacity/arrogance to link his own type to the concept of a god. Free thinking (also) means going beyond these politically correct constraints IMO. It means asking all questions.