^I think that the intution function is able to apply a certain depth to the feeling where primarily surface information gathering can't access. I'm not saying it's good or bad or whatever, it's just how it is.
Dude, calm down. I was talking about NFs and SFs. You decided to bring yourself into the equation all on your own. You're not even a declared SF so why should you be so damn offended?
LOL, I don't waste time trying to apply harmony to things that I know are beyond my control.
Dude, not offended, just a bit incredulous because you seemed so quick to apply your judgment on a large group of people. I'm not a declared anything because I can see myself in all of the IXXPs, in all honesty, although I definitely lean toward the F. I find fault in the personality typing all over the place.
And as far as depth of feeling goes, I don't think the perceiving function is a make-or-break characteristic. Feeling should come primarily from the hmm, feeling function, don't you think? And if you're talking about I/ENFPs and I/ESFPs (which I think you are; I don't know how E/INFJs fit into this) that would be introverted feeling. Introverted feeling seems pretty deep to me. Sure, maybe the secondary function affects how one interprets or expresses that depth, but I think that depth is still there.
Not to mention... it's not like we only use two functions. The Ni tags directly behind the Se in an ISFP, and the Si directly behind the Ne in an INFP,etc, etc. Perhaps that tertiary function is there for a reason?
Tell you what, I'll change my personality type to how I really feel. That help?
P.S. by using introverted feeling as an example, I am not implying in any way that others lack depth of feeling. Merely an example...
And I feel the need to speak up for the underdog, in this case, the SFs you decry.