Cellmold
Wake, See, Sing, Dance
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2012
- Messages
- 6,267
If intelligence is not type related to begin with why would you assume Si is more intelligent than Ti? Also there are 6 billion people on the planet. Atlest 1 billion of them are N types. You sure are bold to make a bet like the bet you made.
Yeah but Riva, you seem quite perturbed by his statement. You arent worried about your own intelligence are you?
He said ISTJ's were more intelligent 'sensor wise' whatever that means....I suppose he meant in a more concrete here and now way.
The point being that the ISTJ's Si is more likely to be intelligent at 'sensorific' aspects than the Ti of an ISTP, who is most likely better at the internal consistancy and principal of...well whatever framework is being considered I suppose.
But any notion of 'better' is slightly odd in function theory because the whole point of functions is that they define cognition...not your capabilities.