Pseudo
New member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,051
- MBTI Type
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
- Instinctual Variant
- so/sx
In simpler terms, there is no natural contradiction between self-interest and giving to charity.
But I'm pointing out that Objectivism is not about the acquisition of wealth, as you stated, but the creation of wealth. That's why I stated that people like [MENTION=16048]Pseudo[/MENTION] can't learn about Objectivism from any thread on this forum and used your comment as an example.
There is a good reason for pointing out this distinction between acquisition and creation of wealth. At least some anti-American sentiment around the world is based on the falsehood that America acquired its wealth primarily through raiding the natural resources of other countries. That is acquiring wealth. But soon we would simply consume what we have acquired. People who criticize the US on this basis (which you are furthering) don't understand that innovation is the key, not acquisition.
I did ask for input from this forum. But also did my own reading.
Charity does go against self-interest. Any forward thinking person wouldn't waste their resources on others if their only goal was continuation of their own existence in a volatile universe. If the rule is "me first" than my self should win every single decision. Nothing should go to anyone that could go to me. If I am more important than other people why would I feel good that they have what was once mine?