Xander
Lex Parsimoniae
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 4,463
- MBTI Type
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 9w8
Is it not true that Ti and Te are both T?
If I gave this as the standard format Uc
fUnction and context.
Ergo Ti is T with a preference for applying it introvertedly and so on.
Is it not therefore true that an INTPs function order is TNSF?
Would I be correct in saying that there are only four functions listed in a types function order because of what it is describing, it does not require the other four?
Surely if the order is describing the order of preference for the four "functions" (as outlined above not in the normal subdivided Ti and Te sense) and making note of where the subject prefers to apply the function then noting the order of preference in which they use functions in a context they don't prefer is redundant.
OR am I barking up the wrong tree?
If I gave this as the standard format Uc
fUnction and context.
Ergo Ti is T with a preference for applying it introvertedly and so on.
Is it not therefore true that an INTPs function order is TNSF?
Would I be correct in saying that there are only four functions listed in a types function order because of what it is describing, it does not require the other four?
Surely if the order is describing the order of preference for the four "functions" (as outlined above not in the normal subdivided Ti and Te sense) and making note of where the subject prefers to apply the function then noting the order of preference in which they use functions in a context they don't prefer is redundant.
OR am I barking up the wrong tree?