I don't think it's a very good test for the very reasons described above. It is not likely to be sound from a psychometric standpoint.
I've been told by a number of people over the years that I'm creative (e.g. marked as "top quality" by every client evaluating me in my LinkedIn profile). The first time I took DISC, my type pattern was the "Creative" type. This test would seem to indicate that I'm not especially creative. Therefore I presume it is either wrong or it is measuring only certain aspects of creativity.
Don't feel bad. Everyone who knows me sees me as extremely creative, adaptable, flexibility, and shifting gears between perspectives like mad... and I score in all those types in whatever personality tests I take.
I didn't even break a 61 in this one.
Whatever they're testing, I have no clue what the heck it is.
In fact, pretty much all my scores were about even... except for my abstraction score, which was a bit higher...
I'm not sure how they calculated the creative stuff at the end, either, but I hope it was just a backend test for them to compare earlier scores to words submitted.... because anyone can jack up their score otherwise putting nonsensical words into the little fields. I could have put 50 of them. In fact, I shall go try!
EDIT: I jammed the word fields with 50-60 words each; my boldness, complexity, and curiosity scores dropped slightly, my abstraction and persistence scores increased. My score went up to 61.7 (almost a whole point).
Now I'll go back and mark all the checkboxes on the prior page.
EDIT EDIT: Marking all the checkboxes resulted in a large increase. My score is now over 66, and my persistence and abstraction and connection ranking increased significantly.
I hope I'm not buggering up their test score database too much, but I think allowing self-reported positive indication on incoherent answers is just silly and ruins any validity for the test at least on the user end.