sulfit
New member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2010
- Messages
- 495
- MBTI Type
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 6w5
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/so
*facepalm* Both MBTI and Socionics are describing same cognitive phenomena. The very same one that Carl Jung has elucidated. Apparently you're just too dense to comprehend it.That's funny because I never said anything about Fi at all, I was talking about Si yet you bring Fi into the matter. It's not Fi that socionics and MBTI stuggle with it's Si. The definitions of Si are different. It's funny how you try and turn things around that you can't explain.
It seems as though semantics and descriptions is something that you can't comprehend properly because there is a clear cut difference in the description of SI in mbti and socionics that are different from one another. Not everybody interprets words in the exact same way both socionics and MBTI are proof of this due to their different modeling system of Jung's theory.
This is a false assumption you can't just assume they operate in the same way, they are two different systems with different meanings attached to them. You have to understand what the theorists are talking about and referencing before you make assumptions about their thoery. If you read the socionics description about it's 8th function you would see that they claim the 8th function (FI in ISFP) is just as strong as their primary(ego) function. MBTI makes no reference of the 8th function being just as strong as their primary. In socionics ISFP DO have FI seen as strong but it's not seen as their primary function. You clearly live in your own bubble not everyone interprets theory in the same way.
Yes Si is same in both systems. Socionics Si has a link to concrete memory just like MBTI Si. This has been discussed numerous times on socionics forums but once again it sounds like you're completely uninformed in socionics matters. Here's an educational video for you: http://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...cionics-It-s-All-in-the-Mind?highlight=memory