This is what I hear: "You are typing others based on your subjective judgments and when people point out they are not true (based on their own subjective judgments) you do not want to correct yourself and criticize them."
The discussion is pointless as you said because you are throwing your own subjective judgments on me which are based on the assumption that other people's subjective judgments about some type carry more weight or are truer then my subjective judgments about that type, which is impossible to verify by you either.
Most of the time, their subjective judgments are based on the type they assume themselves to be, which might very well be off, and when I say a specific trait about a type they identify with, they think to themselves, well I am that type but I am not anything like that, and they tell me that I am wrong just based on that.
So basically it is their understanding against mine and you are basically criticizing me for not prioritizing their opinion over mine. However, I have never been the type to necessarily go for the popular opinion or submit to peer pressure and will stick to my own opinion even if it means rowing against the current.
Rest assured that I have kept revising my understanding whenever I saw compelling reason to do so if that is any consolation.