simulatedworld
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2008
- Messages
- 5,552
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
- Enneagram
- 7w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
Wanker. HA!
LOL I GET IT IT'S ALMOST LIKE HIS NAME EXCEPT SHE CHANGED THE L TO AN N
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wanker. HA!
Reduce your intake by half.
Reduce your bullshit by full.
Take another bong hit. It's the only thing you're good at.
it's Pancake Man's birthday.
Take another bong hit. It's the only thing you're good at.
LOL I GET IT IT'S ALMOST LIKE HIS NAME EXCEPT SHE CHANGED THE L TO AN N
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
For INTJs, you may imagine you see Fe because of the bolded statement :
As a Tertiary Function, Fi typically leads ITJs to retreat into solitary actions that have no constructive worldly effect but are aimed at providing a justification for calling themselves good people. Another example is obsession with the purity of one's soul. For example, being a vegetarian while working at Taco Bell--not out of any great love for animals (the person might hardly know anything about what cows are like), but to be able to say, "Well, at least I never ate any animals." Or engaging in pointless acts of honor, like maintaining super-self-control or "doing one's duty" or going down with the ship. Nothing is gained by going down with the ship; it's a hyper-introverted act aimed at providing a rationalization for one's goodness without regard to real-world consequences. Nearly all of these tertiary-Fi acts involve refraining from action viewed as unethical rather than taking positive action that would accomplish something. They're a retreat from the world--or rather, a rationalization for disregarding worldly matters.
because someone using a weak, Fe tert function would not rock the boat, but would step back and observe the rules of society.
I don't think this is a characteristic of INTJs, generally speaking. Even the ones who aren't planning to take over the world take great delight in things like abortion jokes, or at the very least (in the older, "healthier" ones) disregard the opinions of others to seek to fulfill their own visions.
Not Fe.
Yeah, it might also be that some utilize Fe and others utilize Fi. Perhaps it depends a lot on age of the INTJ, because it's generally assumed the tert function doesn't develop until somewhere in the 20's to "midlife" range. Also, most definitely other factors, like one's ego state, or genetics, contribute as well. Maybe the ones you are used to use Fi more. I know them to use Fe more.
Maybe the ones you know are INFJs
js grasp the world thru singularity. they see the one map that shows the information relevant to the question as an overarching, generalized abstraction (njs).
ps see the world thru the lens of difference. rather than being formed out of identity, seeing something as generalizable and the same (enough) as something else, they focus on particularity. meaning is based on possibilities moving forward (nps), the difference between possibilities constitues the meaning of the move. ps are multi-threaded, they can keep open more possibilities, and backtrack a few (inps vs enps sway the balance between some backtracking and ALL forward). it's like you scan the possibliities, and move in a direction, and then from that moment you kind of merge with the moment and scan for new possibilities.
js need to see the end goal in sight. they need to have a sense of direction that is not so in the moment. or access to the overmap to know why they are doing what they are doing. a generalized over-arching center/gravitational force to hold their actions together (whereas ps make decisions based on their own inner compass, based on particularity, in the moment instead, trusting their Ji). being in the moment is stressful for me, if i have to be and am not prepared. my enp friends, contrasting, hate not being in the moment enough to really explore possibilities. the sense of "we must go this direction" is limiting bc they don't get a chance to really explore, check out options, keep things open-ended, etc.
i see it as multiplicity (p) vs singularity (j). i need to see the way in which to see everything, the BLENDED best vantage point. i'm thinking js blend into one map, and ps maintain that difference is what makes the disparate forms of information relevant to them, keeping open access to a wide variety of mini-maps/simulations based on individual, particular possibilities.
(this is probably a dominant perceiver Ni-Ne bias, because for other types their judgment function could be a higher priority than perceiving in their overall make-up, or because they could be Si-Se and i really don't understand those very well yet).
I saved for 5 years to move to another country
So which dichotomy would maintain a philosophy of "don't take any actions that are detrimental to your overreaching goals and what you really want in life"? Because that's pretty much my mantra.
Yeah, it might also be that some utilize Fe and others utilize Fi. Perhaps it depends a lot on age of the INTJ, because it's generally assumed the tert function doesn't develop until somewhere in the 20's to "midlife" range. Also, most definitely other factors, like one's ego state, or genetics, contribute as well. Maybe the ones you are used to use Fi more. I know them to use Fe more.
They all use both; they're just not INTJs if they prefer Fe over Fi.