wolfy
awsm
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2008
- Messages
- 12,251
emotionally volatile is wimpy
Not if they smack you in the head. And even if they don't, it is all in the style.
emotionally volatile is wimpy
Not if they smack you in the head. And even if they don't, it is all in the style.
yes it is. you have complete control over an emotionally volatile person, they are victims of their own reactions.
No you don't. You can't predict an emotionally volatile persons reactions. Is Dirty Harry wimpy?
yes you can. you simply take note of what they're offended by and why and what their insecurities are (it's under handed, but it's extremely easy to control someone via their insecurities)
Easy to say, hard to do.
I beg to differ (I've witnessed it done countless times)
I'm riddled with insecurities. Manipulate me.
I beg to differ (I've witnessed it done countless times. unhealthy Fe users do it all the time)
Unhealthy Fe users? Like me and ESTPs?
I wouldn't say I was weak when volatile though. That was me at my most inhumane.
Wouldn't it be unethical Fe users with it in first or second place? Not STP.
Unhealthy Fe users? Like me and ESTPs?
I wouldn't say I was weak when volatile though. That was me at my most inhumane.
I don't know many of those. Fe doms tend to brush a lot off and go with the flow in the environment. Just in an extroverted way. The whole deal is that they're mature with Fe. It's a dominant function for them. Just like if someone exercised a muscle all the time, it wouldn't mean that they're actually weak in it. Doesn't make sense.
I don't know many of those. Fe doms tend to brush a lot off and go with the flow in the environment. Just in an extroverted way. The whole deal is that they're mature with Fe. It's a dominant function for them. Just like if someone exercised a muscle all the time, it wouldn't mean that they're actually weak in it. Doesn't make sense.
I don't know, just guessing what was meant. It doesn't seem correct to me that F users have a better hold on values than T users. Values seem separate from typology.
I'll speak from my own perspective, here. I usually leave threads like this alone because my general sentiment, overall, is similar to yours. But I started partaking in this thread myself--and talking about the 'wimpiness' of specific types in the process.I gotta question: I see this thread as one of those negative threads to put people down and I'm absolutely against it.
We see time and time again where people 'use' type to form feedback loops that verify their 'predictions,' often taking a form dangerously similar to circular logic ("See!? This person I typed as ESFJ is displaying what I regard as negative Fe traits. Therefore, Fe is a bad thing, and I hate all Fe users!!"). That's exactly why I say that, if some people in this thread are serious, then they are people that I would like to stay away from.
I'm gonna chime in for the second and final time with the notion that strong-arming other people is weak and pathetic, too. It's not genuine inner-directed strength, at least; it's another strategy that involves not properly facing up to reality or oneself.
I regard bullheaded people as extremely wimpy and pathetic.