I'm actually laughing.
I apologize. I will try to stay away from debates from now on. I promise. Until I can learn to become civil. Ill give a minimum of 30 days. March 27th, same time where i live. Ill just post current events. like i just did. (WITHOUT BEING A PROVOKOTEUR TROLL!!!!!!) (BORING STUFF!!!)While that happens for sure, you know about the much more common Misogyny and Misanthropy right?
They're things too.
Groupthink is BS BTW. Whatever way you want to spin it.
Bingo. People are a product of their environment. This includes women and men, obviously, and whites, blacks, latinos, asians, gays, . . . etc. You get the picture. Feminists, indeed anyone interested in equality of opportunity, want that environment to be free from artificial limitations. We all as individuals already are limited, by factors that have little to do with our membership in any of these groups. That is enough. Let's not impose anything additional. And yes, women seek the same opportunity to serve in other fields that they have gained in the medical and legal fields, and are gaining more of in the field of politics. Just like other groups who have been underrepresented, for the same reasons and via the same mechanisms.yes but allowing women to serve in the medical field and that sort of thing is no longer what feminists seek. in order to continue to hold down a job at their feminist organizations and preserve their organizations (one of my old professors taught me something ill never forget, the duty of any bureacracy is to ensure it stays in practice forever somehow), they expanded it to vaguer definitions of sexism. yes, sweden has a 50 50 male and female politician rate in their national parliament. (or some other scandinavian country, im pretty sure it was sweden). this is progressive sure, but is it economic? no. (hdp party in turkey does this too, within their party, but also 10 percent quote for lgbt, but i commend them for other things). you can not control the market for politicians in such a way that 50 percent of the qualified and publically desired candidates will be 50 percent all the time. some days it will be 43 percent, some days 47 percent, some days 59 percent, some days 52 percent. it is as irrational as controlling prices with rent control. when we know in economics that rent control increases the prices of rent and decreases the quantity and quality of available LEGAL rent (excluding black market). now, i may have detracted from the point because i am having some problems today and i kinda decided to play devils advocate/arguing monkey, but this brings up a valid point. forget abortions, but for the record im not against abortions, because i cant enforce my religious views down other peoples throats. and that's essentially where the argument comes from. and in my case, a desire to bring in a conservative perspective and see how people react. apparently, not well. but one must not ignore human nature. artificially imposing intellectual arguments on a method of living, can sometimes backfire, because while it pays to have progressive fighters fighting on the front lines of society to ensure better quality food, air, water, working conditions, hours, etc. sometimes, not everyone is intellectual. it's like asking a farmer in the us and a phd student in the us to have a lengthy intelelctual discussion and not be family. i got off track, but in other words, sometimes you need to let things be, like the dao. sensors often have it right. an intp that is me often thinks too far into future scenarios without thinking to study for that exam that will get him that finance job. people are a product of their environment, and asking a 10 year old to think about justice and equality by studying chemistry is just gonna confuse them further (though i dont know any 10 year olds' opinion or any 10 year old to be honest, just my intuition, and remembering what i was like when i was 10 and everyone else when they were 10). people are a product of their environment, and by creating a norm, you create a counter reaction, which outdoes the reality of the intended effect. karma.
It is not repulsive, it is pointless. Anyone can hate anyone, for any reason. Sure - there are women who hate men, individually and collectively. And vice versa. So? Hate is ugly and destructive, however it manifests. The insidious thing about gender bias, though, and to lesser extent racial bias, is that much of it is motivated (or at least sold) by good intention: take care of the poor, weak women/blacks. Such a mentality treats the subject as little more than children.why is it so repulsive to point out that women can hate men? hate is hate! and why i am being called sexist for holding a position half the us population and billions of people on this globe hold?
I see. fair point.Bingo. People are a product of their environment. This includes women and men, obviously, and whites, blacks, latinos, asians, gays, . . . etc. You get the picture. Feminists, indeed anyone interested in equality of opportunity, want that environment to be free from artificial limitations. We all as individuals already are limited, by factors that have little to do with our membership in any of these groups. That is enough. Let's not impose anything additional. And yes, women seek the same opportunity to serve in other fields that they have gained in the medical and legal fields, and are gaining more of in the field of politics. Just like other groups who have been underrepresented, for the same reasons and via the same mechanisms.
As for governing assemblies, an argument can be made that to be truly representative, they should reflect the demographics of the population represented. I don't see the need for that and prefer to elect candidates based on merit. It is hard, however, to believe that a group with minimal or even zero representation has proportionately little merit on the political scale. As we all know, both blacks and women were systematically excluded from the political sphere for generations, and are still behind despite having made significant strides.
It is not repulsive, it is pointless. Anyone can hate anyone, for any reason. Sure - there are women who hate men, individually and collectively. And vice versa. So? Hate is ugly and destructive, however it manifests. The insidious thing about gender bias, though, and to lesser extent racial bias, is that much of it is motivated (or at least sold) by good intention: take care of the poor, weak women/blacks. Such a mentality treats the subject as little more than children.
Women: "YOU CAN'T FORCE ME TO HAVE A BABY."
Oh, yeah, but no forced you to have sex.
It's selectful logic, and I'm saying that as a woman.
The problem with abortion is that it's teaching young girls that if they are raped, it's ok to keep it hush hush without convicting the rapist. This doesn't solve any problems, they probably will get raped again and again.
There's so much false information about rape as well, statically speaking- most rape cases are by someone they know, not a stranger. Also, scientists have proofed a women's body actually rejects a man's sperm/pregnancy as a self defense mechanism apparently. How then do women get pregnant by rape? Well, obviously it wasn't a stranger.
There's so much false information about rape as well, statically speaking- most rape cases are by someone they know, not a stranger. Also, scientists have proofed a women's body actually rejects a man's sperm/pregnancy as a self defense mechanism apparently. How then do women get pregnant by rape? Well, obviously it wasn't a stranger.
Women: "YOU CAN'T FORCE ME TO HAVE A BABY."
Oh, yeah, but no forced you to have sex.
It's selectful logic, and I'm saying that as a woman.
The problem with abortion is that it's teaching young girls that if they are raped, it's ok to keep it hush hush without convicting the rapist. This doesn't solve any problems, they probably will get raped again and again.
There's so much false information about rape as well, statically speaking- most rape cases are by someone they know, not a stranger. Also, scientists have proofed a women's body actually rejects a man's sperm/pregnancy as a self defense mechanism apparently. How then do women get pregnant by rape? Well, obviously it wasn't a stranger.
god i hate this place
I like how Franke-Ruta wants to defy the physicians- no one cares about your unprofessional opinion.Absolutely false and utter bullshit, sorry. The exact opposite is true:
'Rape can't cause pregnancy': A brief history of Todd Akin's bogus theory
Cool, a female Tellenbach. You two should reproduce.Women: "YOU CAN'T FORCE ME TO HAVE A BABY."
Oh, yeah, but no forced you to have sex.
It's selectful logic, and I'm saying that as a woman.
The problem with abortion is that it's teaching young girls that if they are raped, it's ok to keep it hush hush without convicting the rapist. This doesn't solve any problems, they probably will get raped again and again.
There's so much false information about rape as well, statically speaking- most rape cases are by someone they know, not a stranger. Also, scientists have proofed a women's body actually rejects a man's sperm/pregnancy as a self defense mechanism apparently. How then do women get pregnant by rape? Well, obviously it wasn't a stranger.