I soon found out mbti was fake psychometrics based on confirmation bias, and as I went deeper I found the founder, Carl Jung, was psychotic and fought on the wrong side of WW II.
And what is fascinating is how attractive mbti is to the vulnerable and the naive, and how they defend mbti in spite of the facts.
It's all bull, IMO. Up there with phrenology.As in, you can type someone just by looking at their photos.
Kinda need to talk to somebody at length about this.
Is it a real thing or is it all bull?
Holy ish. o_o Now I definitely can see how crazy this all sounds. Good observation there!
It's a real thing, obviously?
Lol, of course you can get a glimpse at someone's personality through a photo.
Buuut the OP referred to "facial phenotypes" that would enable you to "type someone just by looking at their photos."
That goes beyond "a glimpse at someone's personality," dontcha think?
Not necessarily; how keen is your eye?
So what makes typing by the way someone's face looks different than phrenology and the like then? I see you've not connected the dots of the two being similar beforehand. What makes typing by appearance legitimate, but not phrenology?
It's a bunch of bullshit.
It was more curiosity that made me ponder its legitimacy, but I think its a farce, honestly. The face thing, I mean.