Also The T function and F function are both rational functions. They are born of intellect and have sweet fuck all to do with how emotional a person is. they are value judgment systems.. One based on objectivity and one based on subjectivity.. Therefore Fs can be robots and Ts can overemotional.
Thinkers make decisions on basis of logical thought. Feelers make decisions based on emotions. This of course does not mean Thinkers are unemotional or that Feelers are unthinking, but it does mean that Feelers are more likely to act emotionally and Thinkers to act rationally.
Insight??? The worlds best Police detectives are sensors as a rule.. yeah there is no insight needed there
Most police detectives collect evidence, find something that their training tells them will point to the perp, and make the arrest. Completely S, and completely devoid of insight. Contrast that to Holmesian deductive detective work, which consists of drawing connections based on seemingly unrelated details that a Sensor would notice, but likely discard as irrelevant because they can't make the connection.
.. OR N and S arrive at the same place, but just take a different route to get there..
Sensors and intuitors seldom arrive at the same conclusion, precisely because they take two different approaches. Comparing ESTJs to ENTJs for example, ESTJs are better administrators, but completely lack vision or a grand strategy. They need others to provide it.
It's kinda hard to put that Intution to practice if you are not living in a physical world. It's kinda hard to expand on what your senses tell you if you have no thought process or insight.
Well, yeah, that's kinda my point. Because sensors have a strong Sensing function and a weak Intuitive function, they find it more difficult to expound on what their senses tell them, but have stronger capabilities in actually noticing minutiae and thus uncovering details. Because intuitors have a weak Sensing function and a strong Intuitive function, they have trouble noticing their surroundings, but have no problem extrapolating a greater meaning, connections and insights from what they
do notice.
P as Klutz's .. Hmmm tell that to all those Professional athletes who are so obviously SP's..
You're right, I fucked that up. Klutziness is an NP trait (derived from lack of awareness to surroundings), rather than P. Ps, instead, are spontaneous, unmotivated and aimless.
You Sir.. need to learn to think outside of the box.
I have no problem thinking outside the box. So far I have concluded that cognitive processes (Particularly the tertiary and inferior functions) do not necessarily fit a person's type, and that at least one type (ENTJ) does not fit its functions, given the very definition of how the dominant and auxiliary functions work. In other words, that Jung may or may not have been on acid when he wrote them up. But that's a whole thread onto itself, so I'd rather not get into it.