Didn't read the thread because lazy...
Also of note, I am very confident with labeling myself as an introvert and a sensor. The others are less confident.
---
Introversion - No, I do not get "drained" by other people. It's actually the opposite. I need people. People energize me. The difference is that I do not naturally tend to have very high energy levels. I am more subdued than extraverts. But it does not mean I don't like people and it does not mean I need to be alone forever (though I seem to get by on less socialization than most). Humans are social creatures! A great majority of us (though there are some SMALL exceptions) need other people, whether we like to admit it or not.
Sensing - No, I am not at all aware of the environment. Please stop with your annoying "sensotard moments" posts. I am one of the least observant people I know. Perhaps Se-dominant people (and Se-aux people depending on their mood) tend to be more highly aware of the environment than others, but that does NOT mean that I am. Introverts tend to live more in their heads than extroverts. I am clumsy and unobservant.
Thinking - I am probably a LOT more emotionally unstable than the typical thinker seems to be (though obviously I am very private about this sort of thing and don't let it show irl). I also seem to be rather emotionally aware of other people, though this was not always the case. I started to notice other people maybe in my early teen years. I also seem to give people the benefit of the doubt more often than a lot of people seem to, which is interesting. I suppose this makes me sound more like a feeler, and I will admit that I am not overly confident in the thinker aspect of my type. However, I have a reason for the typing if anyone wishes to know.
Judging/Te - I am extremely disorganized, messy, lazy, and procrastinate like there's no tomorrow. I am the least J that ever J'd.
This last bit is always annoying to get through though. The "proper" way to determine the final lettering is supposedly to determine one's cognitive functions. But then why not just do away with the current lettering system and just use FiNe for types instead of writing INFP? In MBTI, there still are definitions for more general judging and perceiving types as a dichotomy rather than as cognitive functions. The annoying bit is that there doesn't appear to be a great dichotomous definition in MBTI. Going by the big five, I am VERY unstructured. This is supposed to highly correlate with MBTI perceiving...BUT the thing is that structuredness/unstructuredness is only a small part of the MBTI judging/perceiving dichotomy. I also don't identify with Te definitions relating to organization, but I do relate to Te definitions relating to empiricism. Idk I am rambling and it is 3:30am so I am giving up on this post and stopping with all coherent thought. Cool.