Spurgeon
New member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2011
- Messages
- 239
- MBTI Type
- xNxx
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?:
"Logic cannot be the ultimate authority.
If it were, we couldn't prove the laws of logic to be objectively authoritative in the first place, because we would have to assume they were authoritative in order to do so, which is circular reasoning."
I'm not sure whether I agree with it or not (or whether it even makes sense).
If possible, please explain the reasons for your position.
"Logic cannot be the ultimate authority.
If it were, we couldn't prove the laws of logic to be objectively authoritative in the first place, because we would have to assume they were authoritative in order to do so, which is circular reasoning."
I'm not sure whether I agree with it or not (or whether it even makes sense).
If possible, please explain the reasons for your position.
Last edited: