I believe so. "Untypeable" to me could be a result of many things, like not having a grasp of the cognitive functions, therefore not being able to see what you relate to, or having abnormal distibution of the cognitive functions. I THINK I closest to INTP, but at the same time, I have this feeling of unconfidence in that label. Maybe it is related to steretypes though, who knows. I took that Keys2Cognition test recently and got this bizarre result:
This is considered untypable by MBTI. How Can I excel
so much at Ne and Si, while simulatenously having almost equal Fi, Te, and Fi. The numbers are so close that I can't even separate them. I'm not saying that the results above are correct, but people may not line up into perfectly distributed model MBTI lays out if they truly have something like the above in real life. And who said my top 4
has to consists of two introverted functions and two extroverted functions? In real life, there are probably extremely balanced or proficient people where they can fit into an approximate type, but not totally into a true type. I would consider them somewhat untypeable.