Yeah actually in the video he didn't seem as animated as ENTP's usually are... but that could easily be because he was on the spot and sort of a bit nervous and concerned about how he was coming across (typical E!). He didn't seem very at home with the camera being on him, but wanted to seem as though he did... hm, I don't think that's a type thing though, that could apply to many people of different types.[/youtube]
Let me give you the link to the video I posted of myself a few months ago.
YouTube - My Life As It Stands
I'm much more aware of the camera in this one, and it does come through in how I am.
Because he's so young, I'd say it's not so easy to tell either from the writing or from the video... but the writing contradicts the video to me, tells me there's more animation and enthusiasm, more passion on the inside than appears on the outside. But as I said that could just be in that video - when he's relaxed and without a camera on him, we don't know how passionate/animated he can get.
I wish I could get a recording of me in action. Typically, if I'm into something, what I'll do is dictate; I'll take control of the situation. I'll ask people questions; I'll involve them, while retaining full control and dominance in conversation. I don't at all find it shameful to admit that I'm a loudmouth and I'm aggressively enthusiastic and opinionated in conversation. My words aren't always smooth and I'm not particularly quick or good at getting back in the rebound; but I know how to argue, and I think clearest and most effectively when in the heat of battle (argument).
On the other, he did score highest in Ne and not that high in Te. He also seems to have trouble coming to closure about his type and is constantly doubting it, which could indicate P.
I've scored high in Te many times before. Anyway, the reason I say the test is problematic is because there are basically six questions for each function. If you happen to answer 'Little Me' or 'Not Me' for, say, four out of six of those questions based on Te, guess what? You're not Te. But this might not be the case. Imagine there are ten questions. Imagine you answered 'Little Me' or 'Not Me' for the same four, but 'Exactly Me' or 'A Lot Like Me' for the other six. You are now Te. It's just too slim and short to predict an accurate result. This is why I don't trust it. I've come out as INFP, ESTJ, ISTJ on there, along with a few more. Also, in this test and many more, many of the questions are phrased remarkably poorly, giving me a bad impression. See, if I answer 'I disagree' to 'I am head-in-the-clouds more than I am realistic' that automatically marks me as S. So what, you're telling me ENTJs aren't with it? This is a big flaw. A Te person could never be head-in-the-clouds, otherwise they wouldn't be strong in Te. The flaw is that these tests attempt to test on two bases; dichotomies and functions. So problems come into play. People wonder how they can be ESTPs while remaining strong in Te; they wonder how an INFJ is so good with Te (when all that's happened is that they have scored borderline on F/T, so they could easily have Te as an auxiliary function over Fe). If you type by dichotomies, you cannot use the functions, and vice versa.
However, considering he is in his late teens, I wouldn't put much stock into this. Identity issues are common in adolescence and part of a normal developmental process. This often manifests as a bias towards P. It coincides with the development of Ni in ENTJs. It could explain Ezra's current interest for philosophy. If Ezra remembers himself as being Te as a child, then it would all make sense.
As a kid, I took charge. I was disliked by certain mothers, because I came on too strong, and I dominated their kids. Quite a few loved me though. I could spend hours in my room constructing Lego bases or castles. I'd use to go out and buy loads of packs of toy soldiers, and spend hours setting them up, only to start a war, knowing who I'd want to win (nearly always the English or the crusaders). I had a big imagination, and I'd use wooden blocks, Lego and other models to create huge wars of the future. I've always had an obsession with war; not being the lowest of the low but a general.
By high school, I was the lowest of the low in terms of social rank. But I know I was different, because I was one of the few people who people were not scared of. There was also no reason to dislike me; I was a very likeable character. I was still imaginative and known for it. I was creative. People used to come to me for their names grafittied into the backs of their books. They loved it. Then I'd do it anyway, just because I felt like it, and leave them all over school.
Recently I feel I've lost my imagination. This doesn't really bother me. I got a C in Art at GCSE, which is - to me; by my standards - the kind of turning point from imaginative to practical. It is a failure in my eyes. I'm now considered quite single-minded by my closest friends. As I said in the video, my goal is to make money for future plans. The fundamentals are there; it's finding the method with which to do it.