I was (and still am)excited to see your post. It doesn't matter when but just that you did.
I know the thread went big so fast and I guess it's just something I needed aswell as getting your insight.
In the past when I did something like this I got 3-6 different results, some explanation and still was confused.
So you are helping me out a lot.
Your chart and your insight are really interesting. I've read the Estp and esfp text the first time and there are for sure some things I can relate to but entp and enfp was already before the whole questioning here relevant for me so for sure there are things I can relate to aswell.
While I also can relate to some istp things they strike me to much as practical doers and there were alot of things I couldn't agree with but maybe it's just different with a 9.
Your Point about EXXP seems interesting aswell and I considered it aswell but always thought I have intuition on the stronger side but the real good discussion with yeghor showed me that I may be wrong.
Regarding the tritypes the funny thing is besides 972 I was going to also write 974 in my post but saw 972 slightly higher.
As you may have already noticed I am glad and excited to do both test you mentioned and here are the results:
Personality Assessor | IPIP-300 Personality Test
Screenshot-20210511-090140 — ImgBB
I'm really looking forward to your next post and if you ever need a person for testing some of you theories and concepts who probably get some weird results then just text me
Edit: I found this link
Funky MBTI in Fiction — Enneagram 9: The Peacemaker
and if the descriptions are right then ISTP ESTP and ESFP sounds very good. ENTP aren't so far either and ENFP I have a bit trouble to understand.
I am not really sure their descriptions are really much accurate - I read the ENFP and INFP and I wouldn't strongly argue against them except for the tertiary except that they don't actually tell much.
Ok, I did it here...
First, that Big 5 result is friendly to type 9 - the normal type 9 looks exactly like that except with more Agreeableness and 9s are a little bit introverted rather than ambivert.
I put the Big 5 result on my own Big 5 converter to MBTI and it had this order of results: 1 - ESTP, 2 - ESFP, 3 - ISTP, 4 - ISFP, 5 - ENFP, 6 - ESTJ, so anything below ESTJ is to be taken out of consideration from this converter cause you are surely a P.
So in general it does points towards ESTP 9, which is an unusual combo.
The main reason for why I put ESTP 9 in yellow was dichotomy - there is no conflict between 9 and Se dom, but there is a bit with 9 and EXTX types, but these relies mostly on ENTJ and ESTJ, ENTJ 9 I am secure it doesn't exist, while ESTJ 9 is extremely unlikely.
So I measured which system did fit you best, from HEXACO, Big 5 and MBTI dichotomy, traitly speaking. HEXACO was the best, MBTI was the 2nd right after and Big 5 in 3rd was the worst.
Let me first explain because it is easy to understand what is "the principle" behind it. I will explain by an example that is unrealistically simplified but explains well.
Lets construct an Extraversion dichotomy of two words: Talkative and Outgoing. In my own definition for the example, Extraverts are talkative and outgoing, just that.
So on a self-report test, you can have a "I am talkative", "I am outgoing" and you can mark Much Agree, Agree, indifferent, Disagree, Much Disagree, and these gives origin to the dichotomy "Extraversion".
If you mark both indifferent and one of them much agree and the other much disagree, these are entirely two different cases where Extraversion has the same score. In the first one, you are neither talkative nor outgoing. On the second one, you are simply a talkative that is not outgoing or a person who goes out often and is silent.
When you mark both talkative and outgoing at the same level - and that what Big 5 and HEXACO does expect and MBTI too - then the dimension "Extraversion" exists for you, since they are synchronized with each. If, however, you mark them on the opposite sides, then they are completely out of sync - that means that this dimension does not exist for you, there is no such thing as "Extraversion - talkative and outgoing" for somebody who is silent and outgoing. So the dimension fully does not exist here - 100% of disconnection. While if they are perfectly marked on the exactly same level - such as both 'Agree' - they have 0% of disconnection.
Randomly, as a matter of simplification and due to me not wanting to get deep on the math, I intuitively estimated that by chance, a random results for talkative and outgoing in long term would in average get a 50% disconnection - basically the same disconnection for agree and disagree.
The same thing can be applied for multiple questions on an essay and this can be applied to the facets. So, when the facets of one dimension goes back and forth on high or low for someone who is on the middle of that dimension, there is a big disconnection, so that dimension/factor doesn't exist for the person. If, however, all facets are on the middle and the dimension is on the middle, the dimension 'exists' and its on the middle. You can do that to any level even though there is a natural tendency for the facet to exist for those who are on the extreme sides of it.
So a 50-100 means big disconnection above random average - basically, that dimension have a weak coherence for you.
25-50 is ok.
0-25 means that the facets are quite connected and on synch (rigorously these are not the right words here, but I will use them for the sake of simplicity).
(actually, its 0.5-1, 0.25-0.5, 0.00-0.25, these are percentages)
Although this is more for trait theory and is incredibly valid for Big 5, this is a little bit less valid for other typologies who also uses other things than just trait. But even Jung typology cannot deny traits, even Jung expects traits to correlate between each and be synchronized for each person, such as being internally oriented and being cautious, both Introversion aspects in Jung, so a person who is externally oriented and cautious would be a "desynch".
So now that I explain, here are for every test:
MBTI
Extraversion Existence 0.29
Intuition Existence 0.44
Thinking Existence 0.21
Judgment Existence 0.18
AVG Existence 0.28
Big 5
Extraversion Exist. 0.43
Agreeagleness Exist. 0.38
Conscientiousness Exist. 0.26
Neurotic Exist. 0.23
Openness Exist. 0.50
AVG Exist. 0.36
Honesty-Humility Exist. 0.13
Emotionality Exist. 0.17
Extroversion Exist. 0.25
Agreeableness Exist. 0.34
Conscientiousness Exist. 0.36
Openness Exist. 0.19
AVG Exist. 0.24
Just for reference, from about 40 people on BIg 5, the AVG. Exist is 0.33. From about 50 on HEXACO, the AVG. Exist. is 0.26.
If we look at Big 5 Openness and MBTI Intuition, they are very close to 0.5 meaning that for you the dimension of Openness-Intuition, except on the HEXACO, barely exists - so the definitions of N/S may not suit you well (this can really get controversial for those who believe that the functions exists universally for a 100% of people).
But the HEXACO Openness can be the best replacement for N/S and it indicates sensor for you.
If we look at E/I, on all systems its all right and on the middle, so there is such a thing as E/I for you and you seem to be an ambivert.
If we look at T/F, individually it seems to exist, while for the related to T/F on the other systems - basically emotionality and agreeableness - it seems to exist as well, and, well, as we see on the other results it seems you are more on the middle of it.
Dichotomy J/P seems to exist for you and consistent with P on each system.
Agreeableness and emotionality and neuroticism seems to apply to.
So, basically, this doesn't change my EXXP 9 & ESTP 9 suggestion at all, Big only seems to reinforce it. However, you will have a very hard time seeing your self as Se-dom, Ne-dom or even in Ni-dom and Si-dom if you consider and if you go by trait route (its almost impossible to define these without defining traits, but there might be a person or two who might claim they can do) because your N/S "doesn't exist much" or you go back and forth on the highs and lows of it.
So, yeah, I think this is finally all I got to say.
PS: Self-report are not always reliable and the truth.
In my own example, I did behaviour big 5 test and figured that I terribly self-reported for agreeableness and tried to adjust it later. Agreeableness for Big 5 initially did work terribly for me - 0.72 on my first test ever from years ago 0.4 and something in general, but that I could say it was bad self-report.
I also do have issues with Big 5 Openness as well - mine also goes back and forth - but I don't have with HEXACO Openness and MBTI Intuition.
EDIT: [MENTION=40271]mancino[/MENTION] and [MENTION=39780]noname3788[/MENTION].