I'm one to take these threads lightly. I troll because these discussions are worthless: Even if Bluewing is right (which I think he is on a good bit of it) the Fs, and even most of the Ts (pandering the Fs... probably tryin' to get some pussy y'know...) won't let him be right.
I can hardly see what the major imperative would be for pandering to Fs, since there's no real reward obtainable from other forum members.
I attack BlueWing for the obvious reasons. His definitions of the functions get muddled and crossed-over, and obviously imbalanced with a misinforming bias. He has a big tendency to misinterpret(intentionally or unintentionally) what other people mean. He likes to not respond at all to what are usually the most substantial points against him. He has, as has been very well confirmed by now, used plenty of logical fallacies, and he tends to make factual errors.
We have here this thread, where I just demonstrated that by most definitions, Feeling is rational, and Jung had perfectly good reason for using the word. I needed only to cite a dictionary. Jesus... Doesn't he look anything up? After a while, I can't help but think of "truthiness". "You got your facts from a book, but I got my facts from the heart". This reminds me... He also usually attacks qualities he demonstrates in himself as he attacks them. The most hillarious part is his attack usually states that ____ quality is irrational and thus can't reason. He discredits himself at least as fast as other people discredit him. I have no clue how you could look at the majority of this topics and think they were solidly assembled, and not grievously affected by bias.
Of course, it may just be that you think very much like he does.
However most of the list I suspect to be feelers anyway;
Magic Poriferan
Jennifer
Orangey
Didums
MetalWounds
Night
The Liquid Laser
Haphazard
Edahn
Mr Galt
Aerithria
Blackwater
Ada
Sassafrassquatch
Dnivera
Nemo
Miked277
Grayscale
Zergling
Colmena
Digesthisickness
Uytuun
Most of the strikes are because I'm not familiar enough with their analytic/emotive repertoire to be confident, however several are struck through (most notably Grayscale and Zerlgling) with conviction.
Okay. Which ones are the Feelers and which ones are the Thinkers? Either way, I'm somewhat surprised by that list. I guess I'll have to attribute the surprises to your lack of knowledge about some of these users.
Can I assume that you believe Thinkers are a small minority in the world?