Anecdotal Evidence and Personal Testimony
I have a large circle of aquaintances, but a small circle of friends that I share my inner self with. This circle is comprised of five friends irl and one online friend, not family members. [Of course, family members are in the inner circle,] but I'm talking about the six people I hang out with and choose to spend my time with. All of these friends are male, except for one and she dresses and acts like a male. What on earth does that say about me?!
I am talking about men and women in the large, and you are giving me anecdotal evidence about yourself.
Why would you think anecdotal evidence is anything but anecdotal?
The rest of the world knows that anecdotal evidence is not valid evidence. So why do you think anecdotal evidence is valid?
The answer is simple and stares us in the face.
Anecdotal evidence is called Personal Testimony in Protestantism. And Personal Testimony is a religious practice in Protestantism.
And when we live in a Protestant country, we take Personal Testimony for granted. And it has all the validity of a religious practice.
However almost all of the 7,000 million alive today, only a tiny number are Protestant and do not practise Personal Testimony.
On top of that all scientists know anecdotal evidence, and so Personal Testimony, has no validity.
And yet your world minority culture is determined to force anecdotal evidence down our throats and calls a religious practice, valid.