boom! headshot!The emotionality in this reply of yours above rivals any sign off any feeler has ever posted here. Do you have a curl in the middle of your forehead and did you stamp your foot as it posted?
You don't even know the functions and yet you think you've got iron clad theories on the differences between Feelers and Thinkers. You're a hoot!
LOL, How'd ya think I'd fare if I went over on INTPc and posted a lot of asumptions about INTP's in flip, insulting terms and then posted the little guy behind the wall? Think that would excuse me from facing up to the firestorm of being set straight on it?
You DO want special treatment, constantly coming on, posting and then saying "Oh don't pick part what I say, I am posting this rushed!" "Oh I don't understand the functions"
Why do you deserve such special treatment as to have your rudeness and ignorance on type theory excused?
And this is why you're the Feeler and I'm the Thinker here.
BW: in response to my posts, all you've done is rehash the same old definition of logic over and over again in different iterations. But you've not provided defeaters.
I also like how you skipped over everything to do with quantum physics, the actual details of the "age" problem...
whatever...
Do you realize how many value judgments you made against people who make value judgments? If not, I bolded them for you.
I think value judgments are okay as long as we have a sound rationale behind them. Being ruled by emotions and making value judgments on whim tends to be responsible for most problems cited by ThatGirl.
This is something I can be entirely on board with... but this approach doesn't gel well with your other, more definitive remarks on the worthlessness of value-judgment... (how can one really value something which is a necessary entity?)...
I am saying that when strength and control of emotion is achieved you have the ability to feel what you want when you want most of the time excluding extreme circumstance. Then you choose not to dwell on negative emotion longer than necessary for it to spark the thought process that fixes the situation. Your emotions become independent of external circumstance and that which might bother most and lead a situation to spiral out of control is dismissed because it doesn't really matter.
Fast forward to later that night just ENFJ and I are hanging out and I said something can't remember what. She says "see that's why I was so pissed off earlier" at which point I was done.
If this girl would set her feelings aside and observe herself from the outside in she could work on what she needed to do to get out of the situation that is eating her up inside. But instead she harbors unpredictable emotions that constantly interfere with her objective.
I am saying that when strength and control of emotion is achieved you have the ability to feel what you want when you want most of the time excluding extreme circumstance. Then you choose not to dwell on negative emotion longer than necessary for it to spark the thought process that fixes the situation. Your emotions become independent of external circumstance and that which might bother most and lead a situation to spiral out of control is dismissed because it doesn't really matter.
If you are talking about creating inner calm, yes, it is possible, but the feelings don't go away completely. If they are not too bad, they will go to your dreams or something like that, but still, it takes time for the unconscious to process them. On the other hand, if they are intense, they can cause real damage. Trauma, uncontrollable behavior and so on...
Where does it say that value judgments are altogether worthless?
Unaccomodated by dispassionate reasoning they may be, as then they are but torrential emotions.
It is not necessary to be rational all the time. It is not necessary to be unemotional all the time. Just as it is not necessary to be serious all the time. Just as it is not necessary to be mature all the time.
And, that still isn't justification for F to dictate your decisions. So why?
In the USA, bestiality is forbidden because animals supposedly do not have the ability to consent to sex with humans.
actually it is legal in some usa states. it should be illegal.
disgusting for sure.
I think you can argue against what someone is feeling if it is a misplaced feeling, a choice to indulge destructively, or based on a misunderstanding of a current situation. If a person's feelings result from faulty perception or re-visiting past experiences, then there are at least a couple of ways to "argue against" the feeling.First of all don't be offended by the title I just thought it was funny.
F people creep me out. I don't understand them. I see making decisions off of your feelings as selfish and irrisponsible. The worst excuse ever, "I felt like it", like that matters. If people justify their actions according to their feelings where is the line that says what you were feeling is wrong. It seems immature. How is putting your feelings on someone else productive to anything? Where is the self control? You cant argue against what someone is feeling and asking someone to take your feelings into account is like asking them to cater unobjectively to you.
I am not trying to make people mad here I am trying to understand. What makes you all tick?
orly!? my friend told me Denmark has no laws against bestiality, but I'm too lazy to check. anyway, i edited my post to reflect your knowledgeeee.
But someone else may not think it's so digusting. Also, some think eating meat is disgusting. So why is one illegal and the other not? How is that justifiable, fair, etc?