I think that the theory about some people being more likely to engage in intercourse is quite accurate, but there are several environmental variables involved, too many to narrow it down to type. First, there's the level of drive, the person's life circumstances, the person's values, and the laws and rules of their locale.
P.S.
Uberfuhrer, are you sure you're an INTJ? You seem to think an awful lot about morality. I don't think an INTJ would care about that. Personally, I think an INTJ would care more about achieving their goals efficiently, and could care less about right and wrong. You don't seem to have any goals, or plans for achieving them. You seem interested in self-expression more than anything.
You probably believe you are logical because you reject social values, but this only means you have weak Fe. Since you described killing people as being a form of art to you, this implies that you have a very personalized taste in art, that is completely independent of any sort of external system. This is neither logic nor social virtue. I believe it's a very unusual manifestation of Fi. It seems to me that you just want to erase current definitions of right and wrong, and rewrite them according to your own internal values, but you still believe that there are values. On the other hand, maybe my theory about Te being driven by an unconscious Fi was correct, and a very unusual Te can act like an inverted Fi, that acts to devalue everything rather than value anything, but inadvertently values its own devaluing process, developing unconscious values in the process that are opposite to those of the system it devalues.