Santosha
New member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,516
- MBTI Type
- HUMR
- Enneagram
- 6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
but they have to do with being an NF
I think NF's might be more prone to "magic thinking" in general =D
but they have to do with being an NF
Light givin' you intuition envy?
My n shrivels up just at the sight of the opening credits.
My offensive tactics suck ass. I can only ride the offensive wave or plan a hard ass defense.
huh? what do you mean by this? what about people who use Ni aka NJ?
but they have to do with being an NF
What do you mean what do I mean by this?
It's basic MBTI.
Perceiving functions - N and S.
Judging functions - T and F.
huh? what do you mean by this? what about people who use Ni aka NJ?
My offensive tactics suck ass.
Not really. Sensing feelers often report a sense of telepathic connection with their children, best friend, husband, whatever, like just knowing something's wrong or someone needs them, like women's intuition.
That kind of intuition isn't the same thing. Sensing vibes? No, I don't think it's the same thing.
My n shrivels up just at the sight of the opening credits.
My offensive tactics suck ass. I can only ride the offensive wave or plan a hard ass defense.
Understood. That Te-Se loop can be a motherfucker. It's like Te says "OH SHIT! THIS IS IT!!!" and the Se part goes, "FUCK YEAH, BRAH! LETS DO IT!" and then you're like mid-action when Fi pricks up like, "Guys, somethings not right here..." and then it's like the very second you've completed the action that little nagging Ni-voice at the back of your mind finally comes in clear enough for you to hear "Yeah, you've managed to fuck yourself in like five moves. Nice job, jackass." Creative backtracking ensues.
Lol couldn't have said it better myself.
I don't think Light is a freak. As a matter of fact I completely understand his reasoning. Where our train of thought is different and where my Ni gets left behind is this. I have the same exact defensive tactics as him, which is to shroud and move. So if someone comes at you, you bring the situation back to neutral, and while the person is still trying to regain sight of you, you move. When they come to their senses you aren't standing in front of them anymore. While they try to recoup and start on their direction, they are walking away from you.
A while ago I went head to head with someone who was a lot stronger than myself. I had to go on the defense, so I learned the whole shroud, maneuver, then run. At the same time I was becoming increasingly more introverted, and more introverted. So I just defaulted into the same strategy. I think I have used this so much, I let my offensive components dissipate. I don't turn to lead someone into finale of the act.
....Did that make any sense?
I need vision. To complete the thought. I used to know how....
Oh! That's right. I remember when I killed that part of my thinking. The person I went up against, figured me out too easily. I was so logical, my moves were predictable. So after I would shroud, and maneuver, I forced myself to act without thought. Without logic. To just ride the wave from there. I turned off that portion of my thought process to appear more random. To not be predictable in where my stance existed after. I guess it is use it or lose it....
How crazy did this post just sound? Lol.
He means that all of the sensing and intuition functions are related to Jungian perceiving. Se, Si, Ne, and Ni are all Perceiving functions.
Even though Ni dom/aux are Js.
It is the Judging functions Fi, Ti, Fe, Te that determine P or J. P means you lead with introverted Judging function, and J means you lead with extroverted Judging function.
No offense but you guys haven't really given great suggestions about how to MAKE it happen.
And marm, you can just answer as you interperate it. How does what I said go against jung?
Also if type is such a preferance as everyone keeps saying lately why do people insist you are born as you are, and that type doesn't change? That makes no sense.
It's a subconscious action... If you could will it it'd no longer be based off of intuition, but evidence because that is essentially what you are wanting when you will it. You see things that are connected and are saying 'hey, connect these two things." however since you see the connection intuition has no reason to act upon the event, there is a reason why it is described as obscure connections. It is something that isn't readily used, because obscure relationships don't always exist, however when it is finally used it is fundamental enough to move mountains sort of speak. Somehow I feel like this is wrong, but it's 3am and that's all I have right now.