Would an ESTJ or an ESFJ make a good judge?
No.
Why?
A good judge has to be field independent.
What is the field?
There was in this forum a thread about handwriting.
I read it through and then I read what the Swedish wikipedia says about the subject.
There was not many lines there. The thing amounted to a flat statement that the study of handwriting is superstition and has no validity whatsoever. No discussion.
That reminds me of my teachers at high school and the university. No discussion. About anything.
One of the first things you can detect in a handwriting of an individual is field independence.
I read in the thread that the writing of a left handed individual tilts to the left. Not if the left hander is field independent. Any more than the right hander tilts to the right if he/she is field independent.
No tilt.
Other things you can quickly detect in a handwriting is the level of control and energy and the interplay of control and energy. You can discover the form level and the rythm.
All these things are interconnected.
If you have a low energy and a low control but they are about in a balance you have a good rythm.
If you have a weak energy and a slightly weaker control your handwriting has a soft quality and you have a good rythm.
If you have a weak control and a slightly weaker level of energy your handwriting is remarkably conscious and slow but firm.
If you have a high energy and a high level of control but they are about in a balance you have a good rythm.
If you have a low energy and a way lower level of control your handwriting disintegrates. It does not have a rythm.
If you have a low control and a way lower level of energy your handwriting is slow, ponderous, but stays in line. There is a forced quality of regularity.
Etc..
For example, there are different kinds of looseness or stiffness depending on the variety.
Of the stiff variety there is the formal, the constrained, the ceremonious, the punctilious, the prim, the starch, the stilted, the stately, the chilling, the frigid type.
Or there is the austere, the dogmatic, the uncompromising, the inexorable type.
Or there is the inelegant, the cramped, the harsh, the crude, the graceless, the abrupt type.
And then there is the sobriety. Temperance, abstinence, calmness.
This has nothing to do with the individual study of characters. I have no estimation of the latter study. I am ignorant of it.
When does introversion bring about individual evaluation (field independence)?
When it is rational.
It is called reflection.