No.
Here's why:
(1) What is the purpose of the screenings?
(2) Who will write the assessments?
(3) Who will evaluate them?
(4) What will the compulsory treatment options be for people with: (a) issue "A", (b) issue "B", (c) both issues "A" and "B"?
(5) What is the desired outcome for anyone with a confirmed issue(s) after receiving a compulsory treatment option(s)?
(6) What are the criteria for defining recovery in (5) above?
(7) Is recovery partial or total in remediation? If partial, who decides what level of remission has been achieved?
(8) What are the opportunities for those with partial remission achievements of varying percentages of recovery?
(9) How often must recovery be re-evaluated?
(10) What if there is a relapse or new ailment of any kind for those who have been diagnosed with something, and/or undergone an approved treatment?
(11) WHO WILL PAY?
(12) How will the criteria for all aspects of this program be re-calibrated over time as political ideologies sway the masses?
This conceptual program is a FAIL of the highest order, IMHO.
-Halla74