How can people say that love is a choice? It's something that has always baffled me :S
How can people say that love is a choice? It's something that has always baffled me :S
For me, love is always a choice. Attraction is not.
Nah I won't, let's not get into pendantic discussions. Everybody knows what love means, except when everybody goes on internet forums.
Has a man ever said to you,
"I love you, but I'm just not IN LOVE with
you anymore. I'm sorry but it's over"...
And then told you it's over because he just
doesn't "feel it" for you anymore?
EDIT: Ha, just got this junk e-mail a second ago, and here's the opening lines:
Wait. You believe you can't become attracted to someone over time? So, do you think attraction is unyielding, a constant, and has nothing to do with the influence of external factors like culture or upbringing?
I assumed you meant physical attraction here.
I hope I'm not misinterpreting your post here, but imo, this sort of behavior, quoting your own words: ("Because I love you, I will not enable you. If you want to hang out and talk, give me a ring. But, if you're calling to borrow money, don't bother. It's not going to happen. You need to grow up and learn to take care of yourself and your own finances and I absolutely will not be one to enable you.) is ok if the person is only a lazy bum or just really taking advantage of somebody who deeply cares about them, but it's NOT ok if the person is very sick, and by this i mean unable to care properly for themselves without some sort of assistance from others (mostly family). Do you disagree?
How were you defining love Jen?
That's the problem, it feels to me like throwing myself off a cliff or sticking my hand into a food disposal unit. The mind can try to override that, but even that defeats the purpose -- it's hard to remove the danger/wariness aspect of feeling like I'm on thin ice and could fall through at any time.
(It gets easier with more practice, but still tends to linger.)
How can people say that love is a choice? It's something that has always baffled me :S
Okay,
So all the thinker friends i have say that the phrase "how do you feel" usually doesn't apply to them.
But love is a Feeling, an Emotion.
And thinkers feel love for people (as far as I know..)
I am desperate to understand the thinkers' approach on love and how it differs from the feelers'.
Every PERSON seems to have fallen in love, most have been hurt at one point. And I've met many thinkers that say absolutely wonderful and romantic things about their loved one.
So how does it differ (T vs. F)?
a healthy romantic relationship is something happening between two adults. mutual respect is very important, as is good communication... and of course caring. it's important that there's space for the both different people in the union... and that there's space to grow.
In a nutshell, probably as a commitment to care for someone regardless of whether I feel like it or not -- looking out for their best interests and doing what I can to help them be more them.
Get thee behind us, Satan!!!
Well, I see love as primarily an action and/or choice.
However, a relationship that is all about conscious choice (which incorporates duty as well) and has no real emotional component for many people will be less fulfilling than one that also permits and encourages emotional engagement. I've been in a relationship where love was primarily a choice between both of us, and while there was stability and commitment, the lack of actual feeling/connection left us both really unhappy... and at that point love becomes a chore and not something more transcendent.
I was always envious of what more emotionally directe]d people could become in a relationship, because I just couldn't really do it well no matter how hard I tried. I used to pick on sentimentalism as something "irrational" and silly, and later regretted it because it undermined the emotional parts of my relationships. I remember also making some very big goofs early in my marriage in terms of drawing a hard "T" line in order to encourage more independence in the relationship, all for good reasons .... then later regretted it because I realized I should have prioritized things differently.
I think T tends to do this more easily, but I have F's in my family who are good at it as well. I think part of it is simply learning healthy boundaries, where you can engage when it's beneficial but know where to draw a line for yourself.
That might be true. I am not sure. I know I personally really agree with your comment about "loving someone but not being compatible."
I just really see "detachment" a key factor between T and F. T's typically pull away to get their bearings, to prevent their connections from "tainting" their decisions; F's typically move towards, to prevent distance from tainting their decisions.
But emotions are emotions, and everyone has them.
i think that my feelings are "childish"... it's like i usually don't let them show... i rarely complain, but when i do, i only open up to my so and hope that he would "take care of me"... sort of like hug and tell me it's going to be alright. i don't think he realizes how much it really means to me.
being affectionate with my so is very important to me. i just feel so amazed that i am able to do that with someone. in the beginning of our relationship (after the first getting to know each other bit, when he always took the iniative) i used to ask him where he was going, even if he was just going to the other room
he probably found me amusing then... but we had a lot of fun, too.
When I look back at my relationship, I don't think the way I loved was any different from most people, 'cept the fact that I was private about it and didn't really bother to explain to other people (people didn't realize the intensity I shared with my partner. I believed - and still do - that you don't need to convince others about how true your relationship is. It's me and you against the world, baby. Though I probably can attribute this to introversion). Did I love intensely? Yes, I did. Did I take my feelings and her feelings into consideration? Yes, I did. I also realized that I wasn't saccharine ... we didn't really do the flowers, chocolate, Hallmark cards, romantic dinner kind and all that. If I love you, you can guarantee that I pay 100% attention to what you say, will listen to you about your day, your fears and your ambitions. I will also take care of all your needs. I probably also show you all 100 sides of me while with other people I probably just show 2 and a half.
Bottom line: being in love made me a better person. It softened my Ti. I didn't judge as quickly, I was more easily to forgive, it was so easy for me to be vulnerable and and I didn't really care that at times you were irrational, because I was too.
I've been trying to figure out what love is. And for me, love is wanting to always be with that person. I'm pretty introverted. But I could spend all day every day with my BF and still want to see more of him and I miss him when I'm not with him.
Oh, okay. I hope I will never need to make that choice, I think it would be better if I decide to do what you refer to in your post because I love the person - so, automatically, without a conscious choice on my part. I don't think I can choose not to love a person, either; at best, I can choose not to see them anymore, but that doesn't impact my feelings...
yeah i don't think love is a choice. i think what you chose to do with it is....i don't know...not lovin the whole rationalization of emotion...seems to lessen it to me...but...i function differently.