Jack Flak
Permabanned
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 9,098
- MBTI Type
- type
Do you know your type? INFP would lead to your results, I think.It appears to be IxFP... but I don't know myself very well, so I wouldn't take my answers too seriously.
Do you know your type? INFP would lead to your results, I think.It appears to be IxFP... but I don't know myself very well, so I wouldn't take my answers too seriously.
Do you know your type? INFP would lead to your results, I think.
Seriously, blue, if you don't want to answer the questions, don't take the test! I'm flabbergasted!
If you're J, that means a few Js have picked b for 2 already, and I should therefore work on the wording.I think INFJ, actually, but most people think I'm an INTJ or an ISTJ. I finally got tired of trying, because I couldn't find a way to show that one answer was more correct than any other answer. I still tend to think of myself as an INFJ, but I'm really not sure.
Do you have any of that? And I'm not sure, blue. I kinda wanted to hear from people who finished the test.That is assuming you want constructive criticism?
Just as I thought.Do you have any of that? And I'm not sure, blue. I kinda wanted to hear from people who finished the test.
Only some of them.Fail safe huh?
Even for the liars?
If you're J, that means a few Js have picked b for 2 already, and I should therefore work on the wording.
Yeah, that's J all right.I'm reasonably certain that I'm a J... I don't really live in the moment, I'm kind of rigid, I worry about the future a lot, I get things done on or ahead of time, and I would dislike having to adapt all the time.
Only some of them.
Eileen: I think I even had you in mind when devising question 2, and thought for sure you would have picked a. I guess I learn something every day. Damn it!
Maybe I should change it to ethically.
What do you think about the proposed change in post 152? Would you have chosen a?Well - I do kind of sit close to the INFJ/INFP line. I believe that I'm obviously INFJ, but in as much as we have weak individual letters, I have a very weak "J." But I am totally uncomfortable talking about what is definitively right and wrong. I can recognize corruption in motivation and "bad behavior" but in terms of moral or ethical choices, I am not very likely to say "do this because it's right" or "don't do this because it's wrong."....
I would like some input here. What about changing "I can quickly tell you..." to "I will readily tell you..." for the related questions in 2 and 3?
It's the whole Primary Function business. It's worked more often than not so far, so there's something to it. A judger is more prone to make a decision now than say "let's contemplate this for a while."I don't understand the need for a temporal component, or a discursive one.
I have a strong/absolute sense of what is right and wrong. - will do
Factually true or false - I don't think that is a good test for T.
That needs to be rethought.
Can you explain the reasoning behind the design? I'm not following your logic.
What do you think about the proposed change in post 152? Would you have chosen a?
"Instantly" in questions 2 and 3 changed to "quickly." A small change, for now.
Okay, then I have to figure out how to rework the question so you would choose a. Any ideas?I would not have chosen it over B. I am concerned with ethics/morals for sure, but I do not believe that I am quick to categorize things into simple "right" and "wrong." If I do it, it is still not as basic as recognizing subtlety and nuance.
You can pick those answers if you want, but I'll go out on a limb and say you can't actually be P and J.Interesting choice.
I took a look at the answer key.
I didn't know that you could be TJ and S_P both simultaneously.
Factually true or false - I don't think that is a good test for T.
That needs to be rethought.