Elfboy
Certified Sausage Smoker
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 9,625
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
My thread title is a bit sarcastic or wry. I'm saying that there's hardly anybody on this forum who hasn't been questioned on type. It doesn't have to be in that other thread exactly.
And [MENTION=15291]Mane[/MENTION] said one of the issues is F males mistyping as T. However, in [MENTION=5684]Elfboy[/MENTION]'s case you have a T male mistyping as F.
I've gone through my share of being questioned here. Part of the problem is basing a type call on some evidence while ignoring any evidence to the contrary; people are complex enough that it is always possible to gather enough evidence to change one's call.
Another problem is JCF which has ruined everybody's ability to make a proper type call. Yet another, related to the first one I mentioned above, is the MBTI itself which tries to use static, 19th century-style categories to pin down a dynamic, ineffable structure.
nigga you crazy if you think I'm a T
sure, I'm relatively level headed and make what I think are rational decisions, but for the most part, I go with my gut with little if any in the way of verifying my hunches with evidence (Te) or justifying my positions with inductive logic (Ti). I am as Fi aux as it gets brother
[MENTION=15291]Mane[/MENTION]
.they are almost always along the same lines:
S mistyping as N
F males mistyping as T
T females mistyping as F
EN mistyping as IN
IS mistyping as ES
by far P/J mistypings seem to be the rarest... and yet I/E is the only one accepted by behavioral psychology, "cause of test consistency"... how the fuck did that happen? go figure
^pretty much this