[MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION] - Perhaps. You can see the disparity between the two, him and her. I can only presume the investment of hers into the subject gives rise to her energy being all over the place in this manner. My brother, unprovoked of opinion, said she seems a caricature soccer mom, for what that's worth.
Back to the OP. Here are some
excerpts from a piece written by Jung, first on introverted intuitives:
"As a rule, the intuitive stops at perception; perception is his principal problem...the crank contents himself with the intuition by which he himself is shaped and determined."
"The introverted intuitive's chief repression falls upon the sensation of the object...For we find in his unconscious a compensatory extraverted sensation function of an archaic character. The unconscious personality may, therefore, best be described as an extraverted sensation-type of a rather low and primitive order."
And some excerpts on extraverted sensors:
"No other human type can equal the extraverted sensation-type in realism. His sense for objective facts is extraordinarily developed... His ideal is the actual; in this respect he is considerate. He has no ideals related to ideas -- he has, therefore, no sort of ground for maintaining a hostile attitude towards the reality of things and facts."
"In reality, however, this is by no means the case, since they are equally subject to the sensation of irrational, chance happenings, as they are to rational behaviour."
Regarding the principle characteristics of the two types, we can discover the idiosyncrasies for one who values extraverted sensation versus one who values introverted intuition:
Introverted intuitives grow vested as subjective ideologues. They find external confirmation to their beliefs to be troubling, they merely require they themselves can see the connections behind their sensory experience and this is self-satisfactory. Extraverted sensors, however, grow incorrect about their approaches simply through a lack of objective experience -
they are highly open to future paths of existence. Unlike the introverted intuitive, postulation beyond what can be confirmed is preserved merely as speculation, preferring not to become seated down restrictive avenues of thought. This is what chiefly separates Ne/Se and Ni/Si in the dominant and auxiliary positions - Ne and Se are constantly feeling for holes in the tapestry, while Ni and Si are uncomfortable bringing the blanket down from the attic to begin with.
Resultant of these facts, you have the Ni-user who is nearly held captive by their perceptions and highly critical of outlying information, while the Se-user intellectually floats freely among ideas and concepts, interchanging blocks of thought near effortlessly at the sight of new information. It is why ENTP's are known as far seeing visionaries while INTJ's are known as contingency planning masterminds - ENTP's are looking forward for new information while INTJ's are looking to guard their flanks. There is this quote:
"Intensification of intuition naturally often results in an extraordinary aloofness of the individual from tangible reality; he may even become a complete enigma to his own immediate circle."
I believe people take it to mean the detachment described in the video, but I find this assertion incorrect. It is again describing the general disconnect from fact and reason intuitors experience when intuition is largely preferred over sensation.
This is what it means to be Se-inferior, not the general aloofness presented in this video. By extension, Se does not equate to being "in the moment", or a form of spidey-sense, or all that other junk typically associated with it.
I hope no one thinks I'm hatin'. No one is a caricature.