Ah, an INFJ! They have all the answers. What was it about the wording that you did not identify much with? Anything that screams 'INTJ' on the post?
Well I don't know about answers...and actually, in re-reading all your answers more carefully (wide awake as opposed to about to fall asleep), I am less certain of my original choice.
In the read through the first time, and a good bit of the second time, I get the 'systematic / formal wording and logic' vibe that I do from many of the INTJs I know...but on the second time (when I wasn't half asleep)...I see there are definitely anomalies.
I'll go through a couple of the numbers,
For #2, if I found myself answering the same question, I would have a difficult time not bringing up people/others into the answer. Your answer was a bit like a solo intellectual pursuit, which while that as the de facto answer doesn't resonate with me, perhaps that is your 5w4-ness.
For #3, I still read a good bit of logical problem solving, but for similar reasons to #2, it seems like less of a tell.
Now 4, this one was interesting. You said 'No one makes me feel inferior without my consent.', when I read it, it sounded like something that would come straight out of the INTJs I know, but for myself, it seemed a bit foreign. However, the rest of the response seemed usual and too general for me to see it either way.
For #5, to me, it sounded a bit too purposefully disconnected in the decision making process to allow a more purely logical scheme to be applied. But I am unsure if I am reading it in the light you intended. Especially the 'In contrast, if there are people involved, decision-making is usually swift.'...how is this meant? The decision is quick because it's a no-brainer in siding with the positive outcome for the betterment of the people...or dilemmas which involve people are just simply easier to address at a distance?
For #10, this was another that seemed to be more INTJ telling. The manner of wording and emphasis just seemed a bit foreign to myself, and more of what I'd expect from the INTJs I know.
Now #11, this also was pretty far from resonating with me. While I like a smooth functioning group as the next person, the wording seemed indicative of an apparent disconnect between regimented functionality and global group harmony. Just seemed very Te, at least IMO.
Okay, #14. I'm not going to lie, the bluntness of the first sentence 'That situation does not sound probable' made me chuckle quite a bit. In my head it sounded like Dwight Schrute declaring something 'false' XD. BUT...while I would not have worded it so formally, the general answer is consitant with myself...but it doesn't give me much more than confirming introversion....which we've got down packed.
Okay, now #16 was interesting, because it disrupted my INTJ choice quite a bit. From the INTJs I know, I would find it most difficult for them to answer such as that...and while your answer still would have to be indicative of a balence, it seemed closer to INFJ than most of the other answers led me to believe.
#19 seemed a bit more INTJ-y from my perspective, but I could also picture it as 5w4, so another wash.
And #20, another one that really through a wrench in my original choice. While I know INTJs will love very many of the same activities, I still got a nice INFJ vibe off of that one...especially the manner which you ended the answer.
Alright! Sorry for the wall of text. XD But perhaps that will provide maybe some insight into what I was thinking!
And while I'm less solid on my original INFJ declaration, I think I still would have to side with the INTJ 5w4, because I still get that vibe more. But perhaps Rasofy is on to it, with the balenced Fe-Ti.
Hopefully more people will chime in to provide you with more perspectives!