Quinlan
Intriguing....
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,004
- MBTI Type
- ISFP
- Enneagram
- 9w1
No I don't agree, N deals with not-well-defined information, it can't be data; the opposite is valid for T. At least...in the model I use.
Why not? Data is data whether it is well defined or not isn't it?
To me N and S draw in data (well defined or not) and it is T and F that processes the data (defines it, gives it meaning, decides what to do with it etc.).
Data is passive (it just is) and evaluation is active (makes a statement about what is).
Perception (N and S) is passive (it just is) and Judgement (T and F) is active (makes a statement about something).
Therefore to me imagination is simply the internal combination of a judging and a percieving process/es. Perception providing the matierials and judgement constructing the internal world or concept.
I wonder if that makes any sense.