Thaaaat's right. You're my woman.
LOL, Eniac wasn't binary, silly.Dear [Smokin' Hott NF Babe]:
11000101001, 1001 010 0001 010 0101 101 101 0111. 101010001, 1010011, 01010100 01001 01 1001 0101 1010 10. 1010 1001010 0101 10 101 0. 01010010 01 00 1010 01 010 10101010. 1010 101010 101001 101 [princess leia outfit] 010001?
Sincerely, ENIAC
Yo NF,
*chomps teeth*
-Iceman
Why are you assuming Pink's post was in binary? It's 0s and 1s, which are valid in any base.LOL, Eniac wasn't binary, silly.
Statistically speaking, that's basically impossible.Why are you assuming Pink's post was in binary? It's 0s and 1s, which are valid in any base.
/NT
Sorry, buddy. Size doesn't matter.Statistically speaking, that's basically impossible.
/NT
LOLSorry, buddy. Size doesn't matter.
Statistically speaking, that's basically impossible.
/NT
That's irrelevant. In the decimal system, where ten digits are available, to stick to two intentionally or randomly in a long string is very improbable.No one said it was randomly generated.
That's irrelevant. In the decimal system, where ten digits are available, to stick to two intentionally or randomly in a long string is very improbable.
And for all you know, the sky turns fluorescent green every time you look away.Errr... It's only improbable if the string is intended to have some kind of encoded function. If I just wanted to type something for the hell of it, using only two digits isn't less probable than anything else.
For all you know, her letter was just supposed to be a wall of messageless 1s and 0s.
(Hey! I thought we weren't going to tell him about that!)And for all you know, the sky turns fluorescent green every time you look away.
Yeah, really. We just can't contain our passion.... and I think it's all kinds of awesome that a thread on idealist INTP romance had degraded into an intense debate on numeric distribution probability.
It's no wonder they can't keep their hands off of us.