Kalach
Filthy Apes!
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 4,310
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
Does anybody see problems with this?
Yeah, it's contingent analysis, matching observed behavior to type models and supposing a connection. Or, y'know, not Ti, <insult removed>. You wrote a book on typology and you can't determine when you're own preferences are squealing?
I'll tell you what, imma measure your skill at analysis by what analysis you've done. That comment about the messy desk? It comes at the end of a series of posts complaining that no one demonstrates the validity of their type assertions by connecting supposed behavior to what can rightly come from cognition. In short, they were proving at the level of "does he have a messy desk?" Or, "did he plan his escape?" Or "does he have ideals?" Or "did he wait a long time?" These macro behaviors and states can be demonstrated by anyone. But what of the motherfucker's stated imperatives? How often do different types sound the same in matters of importance to themselves? Do they refer to the same kinds of perceptions? Do they demonstrate adherence to the same kinds of judgement? Which terms do they put out there first for you to see? Y'know, typology questions.
Now, you didn't see that that's where I was going with that stuff. In the words of the Bard, would you like to entertain your mother now?
Last edited by a moderator: