I guess you haven't read the book, either. It's about a guy who talks about his friend who bought a brand new BMW bike, but when it breaks down, has to go to the mechanic every time because he doesn't bother with learning how to deal with it himself. On the other hand, the narrator has an old bike he constantly maintains, but not for the bike itself. Through the maintenance of the bike, and learning about it, he learns deep truths about the nature of things. For one, the bike isn't a collection of material parts, but rather a human construct. Not only that, but the steel used for the bike isn't even a concrete reality, but a human construct - steel doesn't exist in nature, someone had to imagine it. Both the bike and the steel truly exist in the human imagination, while the material manifestation of them are the true abstractions. So on and so forth, through the application of logical analysis to the most seemingly basic of tasks, he uncovers more and more concepts of reality, deeper than his friend who thought himself superior to mere manual tasks as that one.
Like I said - really smart. In fact, I think Newton may have been an ISTP.
So are you saying an ISTP wrote that book? Or an ISTP reads that book. Look at what I do to reality, how I cross reference all this crap off the top of my head. Its one thing to "read" about and regurgitate, its another to actually do this. I am trying to get you to see something. Please keep explaining onemoretime, you are helping me understand what it is I do, but I do it at a practical level.