Aleksei, that may be true, but their validation for Adam and Eve, even in this article, is as such:
Assuming from the get-go evolution is true, then at some point in human history (note: before the world was created 6,000 years ago according to creationism) a man, whom existed not in the location Eden supposedly existed (in the Middle East, not Africa, given geological evidence from the Bible) in and was born of two parents whom fucked mutated a genetic aspect common to all men today. Also, a woman, also made more out of fucking than a rib and who did not live within one hundred millenia of the aforementioned Adam also randomly mutated something now common to all female humans. There was no snake. There was no apple (or fig, as it was originally intended). There was no Godly advice. There was no original sin. There was only a couple widely separated possible to probable common ancestors, existing in purely evolutionary terms.
They really aren't saying these myths are at all accurate, but that they aline with possible truths very loosely.