Neokortex
New member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2016
- Messages
- 186
- MBTI Type
- INFP
- Enneagram
- 461
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
So.
The way I figure it: the heart type Sx/Sps are intimately into sharing deep emotions, esp. think negative emotions should be expressed, given way; head type Sx/Sp-s are into really following the other's train of thought, the confidentiality to give flow btw the two, like two scientists passionately working on a project; and the gut-type Sx/Sps are supposed to... uuhm, be into penetrating the corporeal, physical reality?
Like, I'm always more interested in ppl's body habbits and how they cover it up. How much they eat, how much money they spend on things, superficialities, being veiled by the excuses they give for those actions. Like saying you're going golfing but then wind up in a bar to shower your liver with some toxic excesses of booze just because that helps the Fe going in a group setting. Ppl's greed and also their sexuality. Anything under the facade of emotions or intellectualized rationalizations. But thru time I've become aware that people can't really enjoy some activities without giving a superficial layer of meaning. Like if I want sex, then I want sex but ppl tend to give all kinds of other reasons, like they can only feel like having sex when XY turns out to empathize with Dumbledore from Harry Potter. Or both are passionately into stamp collection, the theme of which colors their sex.
Is there anyone here who gets this? Perhaps related to my 6 as well. That doubt about social expression. We're supposed to get on with each other, make friendships, chit-chat, etc., whereas no one's really expected to bring in the politics into the picture, the economy that actually separates us. Social stratification. Silent exclusions. You love somebody very much but how much are you spending on them? This whole understructure of corporeal realities giving way to uperstructures of mind, emotions emerge over, but which, at the same time is always neglected (prosaic, profane) always have to be a side concern. Like feminism, nobel ideal but aren't we all men, in a sense guardians, from birth of "our" women, from other potential (group/nation of) men? The difference in physical strength will make it problematic since there's still physical threat from humans in the world (terrorists, sex hungry immigrants, etc).
The way I figure it: the heart type Sx/Sps are intimately into sharing deep emotions, esp. think negative emotions should be expressed, given way; head type Sx/Sp-s are into really following the other's train of thought, the confidentiality to give flow btw the two, like two scientists passionately working on a project; and the gut-type Sx/Sps are supposed to... uuhm, be into penetrating the corporeal, physical reality?
Like, I'm always more interested in ppl's body habbits and how they cover it up. How much they eat, how much money they spend on things, superficialities, being veiled by the excuses they give for those actions. Like saying you're going golfing but then wind up in a bar to shower your liver with some toxic excesses of booze just because that helps the Fe going in a group setting. Ppl's greed and also their sexuality. Anything under the facade of emotions or intellectualized rationalizations. But thru time I've become aware that people can't really enjoy some activities without giving a superficial layer of meaning. Like if I want sex, then I want sex but ppl tend to give all kinds of other reasons, like they can only feel like having sex when XY turns out to empathize with Dumbledore from Harry Potter. Or both are passionately into stamp collection, the theme of which colors their sex.
Is there anyone here who gets this? Perhaps related to my 6 as well. That doubt about social expression. We're supposed to get on with each other, make friendships, chit-chat, etc., whereas no one's really expected to bring in the politics into the picture, the economy that actually separates us. Social stratification. Silent exclusions. You love somebody very much but how much are you spending on them? This whole understructure of corporeal realities giving way to uperstructures of mind, emotions emerge over, but which, at the same time is always neglected (prosaic, profane) always have to be a side concern. Like feminism, nobel ideal but aren't we all men, in a sense guardians, from birth of "our" women, from other potential (group/nation of) men? The difference in physical strength will make it problematic since there's still physical threat from humans in the world (terrorists, sex hungry immigrants, etc).